Floyd Rewatching Marquez-Pacquiao IV

[Roadblock]

Yeah right but you jumped in the conversation didn't you and what part isn't the truth.

Nobody mentioned how Manny Pacquiao beat the brakes off Oscar yet so you can cry a river about Oscar being drained and how Manny never rematched Cotto that's not in the history books either

Im rained in thought I would see what the idiots are doing and you popped up lol , what exactly is it youre trying to say, what is your point lol

[Haka]

No you got a BS opinion, the record books which have recorded fact says the opposite to your BS, havent you learned dont debate opinion as fact will KO you everytime, as usual lol.

That duck list is also a piece of history.

[djtmal]

Im rained in thought I would see what the idiots are doinglol

Iron Dan and the rest of the Floyd Boys were waiting on you

[IceTrayDaGang]

I'm not sticking up for anyone.

I am pointing out that if someone is going to call Marquez a "drug cheat" with zero demonstrable evidence on the basis he has worked with someone linked to PEDs then you have to be consistent and do the same with Pacquaio.
.

omg!! that's my point!!!!!! mofos on here was accusing manny of being on peds with no proof!!! pac wasnt working with a known ped pusher!!!! so why didnt i see you sticking up for manny when posters on here was accusing him of being on peds with NO proof!! yet, here you are going life and death with another poster on here for pages sticking up for marquez!!

my point here is that, manny has NEVER been caught using peds or was linked to anyone who was a ped pusher!!! yet, posters had no problems accusing manny! but here you are fighting for marquez even though he went and hooked up with a known ped pusher then knocked manny out after 3 fights which he never came close to doing.. but no su****ion at all right?

but that doednt mean anything to you, but you are bringing up ariza, who has never been caught for selling peds, etc... and the rios incident happened AFTER manny fired ariza, but here you are bringing up ariza even tho he was never caught like memo!!!

[djtmal]

Prime Mosley in 1999
Mosley 2006
Tszyu
undefeated Cotto
Margarito
PWill 147
prime Pac
Sergio 154
Thurman
Spence
Brook
Bradley

He backed out of a Winky Wright fight that he called for as well

[djtmal]

omg!! that's my point!!!!!! mofos on here was accusing manny of being on peds with no proof!!! pac wasnt working with a known ped pusher!!!! so why didnt i see you sticking up for manny when posters on here was accusing him of being on peds with NO proof!! yet, here you are going life and death with another poster on here for pages sticking up for marquez!!

You should know that wasn't happening he is a card carrying Floyd Boy

[IceTrayDaGang]

You should know that wasn't happening he is a card carrying Floyd Boy

yeah i see right thru his post.... he pick and choose...

[IronDanHamza]

Well they should have

He won every round after being knocked down. Beat the brakes off Hatton

Collazo basically softened Hatton up for Mayweather now that you think about it.

Wait a minute, you're saying Collazo won Rounds 2-12?

What a fucking retard. You haven't watched this fight, that's clear. Or you either haven't watched it or you are even more retarded than we originally thought, which is close to impossible.



Collazo had 4 clear rounds in the fight;

5,6,10,12

Hatton had 5 clear rounds;

1 (10-8) ,3,8,9,11

Either way rounds;

2,4,7



Final punch stats;

Hatton 259/741

Collazo 213/712

That's 7-5 either way, with a KD for Hatton. Meaning it's a point or two either way. Which all 3 judges that it in that range.

That's actually what happened you stupid fat retard.

[IronDanHamza]

omg!! that's my point!!!!!! mofos on here was accusing manny of being on peds with no proof!!! pac wasnt working with a known ped pusher!!!! so why didnt i see you sticking up for manny when posters on here was accusing him of being on peds with NO proof!! yet, here you are going life and death with another poster on here for pages sticking up for marquez!!

Ok, why am I supposed to care what other people do and say? I couldn't care any less.

That poster is calling Marquez a drug cheat on the basis he works with someone linked to PEDs. That is not evidence for someone using PEDs.

It doesn't matter if your name is Marquez, Pacquaio, Jim Jones or Tim Jones.

There is just as much evidence for Pacquaio being on PEDs as there is Marquez being on PEDs; Zero. Either neither one is a "drug cheat" or both are.

my point here is that, manny has NEVER been caught using peds or was linked to anyone who was a ped pusher!!! yet, posters had no problems accusing manny! but here you are fighting for marquez even though he went and hooked up with a known ped pusher then knocked manny out after 3 fights which he never came close to doing.. but no su****ion at all right?

I DON'T CARE what posters want to say. It's irrelevant. I'd say the same if someone was labelling Pacquaio a "drug cheat" for that same reason and already have a plethora of times on this website.

You've decided to make up a fantasy scenario where I have not only not done that but apparently under the group "ya'll" have even accused Pacquaio of being on PEDs which I have never done.

but that doednt mean anything to you, but you are bringing up ariza, who has never been caught for selling peds, etc... and the rios incident happened AFTER manny fired ariza, but here you are bringing up ariza even tho he was never caught like memo!!!

When and where is irrelevant, Ariza has links to PED use. It's as simple as that.

If working with someone linked to PEDs is evidence of PED use then anyone who worked with Memo, Ariza or anyone in that field both before AND AFTER are to be held to the same standard.

It's really just as simple as that. Either all of them are "drug cheats" or none of them are.

There is no demonstrable evidence that Pacquaio, or Marquez used PEDs in their boxing career. It is as simple as that.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Ok, why am I supposed to care what other people do and say? I couldn't care any less.

That poster is calling Marquez a drug cheat on the basis he works with someone linked to PEDs. That is not evidence for someone using PEDs.

It doesn't matter if your name is Marquez, Pacquaio, Jim Jones or Tim Jones.

There is just as much evidence for Pacquaio being on PEDs as there is Marquez being on PEDs; Zero. Either neither one is a "drug cheat" or both are.




I DON'T CARE what posters want to say. It's irrelevant. I'd say the same if someone was labelling Pacquaio a "drug cheat" for that same reason and already have a plethora of times on this website.

You've decided to make up a fantasy scenario where I have not only not done that but apparently under the group "ya'll" have even accused Pacquaio of being on PEDs which I have never done.



When and where is irrelevant, Ariza has links to PED use. It's as simple as that.

If working with someone linked to PEDs is evidence of PED use then anyone who worked with Memo, Ariza or anyone in that field both before AND AFTER are to be held to the same standard.

It's really just as simple as that. Either all of them are "drug cheats" or none of them are.

There is no demonstrable evidence that Pacquaio, or Marquez used PEDs in their boxing career. It is as simple as that.

1. you do care, because you are on here defending marquez from other posters accusing him of being on peds.

2. yet, when other posters on here accused manny of being on peds because his "head grew", that was enough evidence right?

3. my point here is that you got triggered by a poster calling marquez a drug cheat. it's not far-fetched to believe he was on it since he pretty much hooked up with a known ped pusher who was caught and convicted!!! you got so triggered by this accusation that you went on with that poster for multiple pages, bringing up manny and his relationship with ariza, who has never been caught for supplying peds, yet you brought ariza up to try and say "if you gonna accuse marquez, then you have to include manny as well".