Comments Thread For: Lamont Roach Jnr not surprised NYSAC declined appeal of Gervonta Davis draw

[MulaKO]

Can you explain how, " What the ref can do has no bearing on what the ref did do..." means that? Let me see if I can fit together what you say you meant using your logic. What a ref can do is grant a timeout if he follows the correct process, but this has no bearing on the fact that the ref decided not to follow the rules when a fighter takes a knee... The "no bearing" phrase does not make sense here. What you mean is, what a ref can do under the rules is not what the ref did in the fight.

Does it matter to you why a fighter takes a knee? If not, we can end the argument.

Yes it does matter right after his count determining he touched ground making it a knockdown
Now what’s going on Tank would be the moment you speak of

[Aware]

huhhhhh??? thats nothing like the tank incident!!!! ref saw it and gave him 5 minsssss everyboyd could seewhat happened nobody was confused at all usyk did not take a timeout on a LEGAL BLOW and run to his corner to geet his corner invoved as well?? u awaake??

It's difficult to have this back and forth with people who don't read or understand what I have written. What is the context of me bringing that example up? Did I say it's exactly what happened here? Or was a response to the other guy saying, "It wasn't the ref's call"?

[Aware]

Roach committed no foul so your arguing something that just isn’t there
The actual foul was committed by Tank no matter what discrepancies you might wanna throw in
Let’s start there

You just hopped into this now, but you clearly don't understand the context.

[QballLobo]

Can you explain how, " What the ref can do has no bearing on what the ref did do..." means that? Let me see if I can fit together what you say you meant using your logic. What a ref can do is grant a timeout if he follows the correct process, but this has no bearing on the fact that the ref decided not to follow the rules when a fighter takes a knee... The "no bearing" phrase does not make sense here. What you mean is, what a ref can do under the rules is not what the ref did in the fight.

Does it matter to you why a fighter takes a knee? If not, we can end the argument.

I’ll try it again since you seem a bit slow. The ref CAN make judgement calls during the fight as long as they follow the rules as they were trained to do.

The ref CANNOT make it up as they go and throw the rules and protocols as they see fit. Case in point: Tank dropped to a knee with no prior consultation to the ref. When Tank did that it doesn’t matter WHY he took a knee. The ref is REQUIRED to take a 10 count and award the knockdown. Which he started to do then stopped. That was the error and why it should have been changed post fight or a replay should have been done.

IF the ref initiates the stoppage then they can make that call. But since the fighter took a knee on their own then that takes the decision out of the refs hands. They have to award it as a knockdown.

It’s really not that hard to understand.

[MulaKO]

You just hopped into this now, but you clearly don't understand the context.

I’m still stating the obvious which you seem to misunderstand
The ref is to judge what is going on in the fight first and foremost
Tank’s glove touched the mat and hence it should of been a count and then a questioning of what seemed to be the problem
Making that a 10/8 round or at worse a 9/9 round
Simple , non-toxic and self
efficient

[Aware]

I’ll try it again since you seem a bit slow. The ref CAN make judgement calls during the fight as long as they follow the rules as they were trained to do.

The ref CANNOT make it up as they go and throw the rules and protocols as they see fit. Case in point: Tank dropped to a knee with no prior consultation to the ref. When Tank did that it doesn’t matter WHY he took a knee. The ref is REQUIRED to take a 10 count and award the knockdown. Which he started to do then stopped. That was the error and why it should have been changed post fight or a replay should have been done.

IF the ref initiates the stoppage then they can make that call. But since the fighter took a knee on their own then that takes the decision out of the refs hands. They have to award it as a knockdown.

It’s really not that hard to understand.

How does the phrase, "no bearing" make sense in the context you used it in?

[Aware]

I’m still stating the obvious which you seem to misunderstand
The ref is to judge what is going on in the fight first and foremost
Tank’s glove touched the mat and hence it should of been a count and then a questioning of what seemed to be the problem
Making that a 10/8 round or at worse a 9/9 round
Simple , non-toxic and self
efficient

No. I never argued that by the rules it was not a knockdown. That's why you need to understand the context before you hop in.

[MulaKO]

No. I never argued that by the rules it was not a knockdown. That's why you need to understand the context before you hop in.

Yeah wtv
lmao
The context is you wrong
Later

[Aware]

the ref made 2 wrong calls in a matter of about 2 seconds LOL and both CLEARLY WRONG thats 2 CLEARLY wrong ref calls it does not compare in any way to the usyk shot which he called LOW

Omg! You have no clue...That's not what I'm arguing.

[QballLobo]

How does the phrase, "no bearing" make sense in the context you used it in?

A number of people have been trying to explain to yiou and you simply are not comprehending. Take a step back and use some self awareness and realize the problem is your lack ability here.