Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?
Collapse
-
Neither fighter deserved a win that fight was an awful amateurish display.
It was garbage. Many hard rounds to score I can understand the complaints but it was what it was, Dirrell fought too safe, I gave early rounds to Froch when both men did very little I felt Froch was more active/agressive. Andre should have fought like he did in the latter rounds from the start, probably would have stopped Froch but he didnt want to risk it.Comment
-
Froch won...the simple fact is Froch is the Champion and you should TAKE the belt. Cant have a close decision, against the Champ in his backyard and he is unbeaten to top it off and WHITE.
The only thing questionable were the 2 scores and that biased ass ref.Comment
-
It wasn't close.Comment
-
Comment
-
Are YOU known for being fair about European boxers?
If you were a boxing judge, no European fighter would ever win a single round!
Comment
-
I really do not know what Froch did in the fight other then land a few punches and foul.
To me Dirrell fought perfect because Froch had no answers for what Dirrell was doing. I do understand it is tough to fight that way and get a decision in another fighters hometown, when it happeaned I was not shocked at all nor even upset even though I lost money, as soon as split decison was announced I was resigned to my fate.
Reading dumb **** about the fight on here does get me fired up about it though.Comment
Comment