Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by mrpain81 View Post
    I think a draw wouldn't have been a bad score, Dirrell really fought like a scared women for a lot of the fight. Landing a few jabs then holding and falling down isn't going to win you rounds imo.

    yea i kno but hitting ur opponent in the back of the head repeatedly in ur home town will win u a desicion so o well

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Aracibo04 View Post
      what did froch do to deserve a win?
      Originally posted by sylvestersweet View Post
      I had Froch in my avi a couple months ago and I think he lost.
      Originally posted by Precision View Post
      I'm British and Froch clearly lost.
      Neither fighter deserved a win that fight was an awful amateurish display.
      It was garbage. Many hard rounds to score I can understand the complaints but it was what it was, Dirrell fought too safe, I gave early rounds to Froch when both men did very little I felt Froch was more active/agressive. Andre should have fought like he did in the latter rounds from the start, probably would have stopped Froch but he didnt want to risk it.

      Comment


      • #33
        Froch won...the simple fact is Froch is the Champion and you should TAKE the belt. Cant have a close decision, against the Champ in his backyard and he is unbeaten to top it off and WHITE.
        The only thing questionable were the 2 scores and that biased ass ref.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Dondi33O View Post
          Froch won...the simple fact is Froch is the Champion and you should TAKE the belt. Cant have a close decision, against the Champ in his backyard and he is unbeaten to top it off and WHITE.
          The only thing questionable were the 2 scores and that biased ass ref.
          It wasn't close.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
            It wasn't close.
            OBVIOUSLY opinions vary.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
              It wasn't close.
              Sure wasn't Dirrell won that fight hands down. I watch the British version and the entire time I was like what the **** are these cats watching. Deep down Bunce knew Dirrell won. He was so impressed with what he saw

              Comment


              • #37
                steve bunce said england was the fairest country in the world before the fight took place. he even pretended like froch deserved to win. what a classless twit.

                Comment


                • #38
                  poll speaks for itself, gents.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by daggum View Post
                    steve bunce said england was the fairest country in the world before the fight took place. he even pretended like froch deserved to win. what a classless twit.
                    Are YOU known for being fair about European boxers?

                    If you were a boxing judge, no European fighter would ever win a single round!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I really do not know what Froch did in the fight other then land a few punches and foul.

                      To me Dirrell fought perfect because Froch had no answers for what Dirrell was doing. I do understand it is tough to fight that way and get a decision in another fighters hometown, when it happeaned I was not shocked at all nor even upset even though I lost money, as soon as split decison was announced I was resigned to my fate.

                      Reading dumb **** about the fight on here does get me fired up about it though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP