Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pay-per-views, price points, and price counterpoints

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MastaBlasta
    replied
    LoL @ "buying to send a message". Hah, that's funny. I bought the Benavidez-Morrell PPV, and it was good BUT, $80 is too much. These matchups aren't Mayweather vs Paquiao level and I really don't see many coming that will be that level. All promoters getting buys at these prices better enjoy it while it lasts. It will be joining the dinosaurs.

    $25 for a PPV in this era is about right. And that's for only the biggest matchups. A lot of these other PPV promotions are reaches. Many of us love boxing. But we got much better fights on free TV back in the day (80's, 90's, etc). The world changes true enough but technology brings prices down not up. Only very special events are gonna be ale to sustain high-priced PPVs.

    I enjoyed the run of PPV's that were also shown in IMAX theaters for $20 in the 20-teens (2012 - 2020). By far this was the best value and presentation for fans. A theater full of fans with food, popcorn, soft and hard drinks was awesome. IMAX screens are the best seat in the house by a mile. Promoters should be working to maximize this.
    Last edited by MastaBlasta; 02-02-2025, 04:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • crimsonfalcon07
    replied
    Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
    lol ridiculous: "“You have to remember,” Taffet said, “that pay-per-view boxing is primarily viewed like a Super Bowl party, where six, eight, 10 people get together and spend the evening together and watch a fight. So, $80 for a fight on a Saturday night when you’ve got 10 people together is actually much less than the cost of a movie ticket for each person.​" This line of thinking drove boxing fans to illegal ******ing by making every single decent fight a PPV.
    So true. I bought the fight today and will more than likely be watching it by myself on my 120" screen because most of my acquaintances aren't really into boxing. I'll buy the Saudi card, but mismatches like Tank's card aren't worth my time, let alone my money, IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkinG209
    replied
    Originally posted by El_Feroz99 View Post

    For sure, in 2002 one of these three would have been a ppv, one boxing after dark, and the last friday night fights.

    Fnf might be a bit unfair, but I bet I wouldn't enjoy tanks card much more than a good FNF broadcast.

    Al just has no money left...good on him for overpaying guys for mostly boring matchups.
    Tank fights remind me of Andre Bertos fights back in the day on HBO boxing after dark. I remember he was making at least one million fighting the likes of Freddy Hernandez! It ****** but at least they weren’t PPV. I only pay for 50-50 fights as we all should!

    Leave a comment:


  • El_Feroz99
    replied
    Originally posted by Sheikh View Post
    These guys are not cognizant of what's going on out there. There's a reason that people aren't buying pay-per-views anymore. The fights are not competitive anymore. That is why people are forced to steal. Ppv used to be for the top and best Elite fights now they are junk. You have a a Fighter fighting a d fighter where everyone knows the result. Saudi cards are worth it. I don't mind paying for those.
    For sure, in 2002 one of these three would have been a ppv, one boxing after dark, and the last friday night fights.

    Fnf might be a bit unfair, but I bet I wouldn't enjoy tanks card much more than a good FNF broadcast.

    Al just has no money left...good on him for overpaying guys for mostly boring matchups.
    MulaKO MulaKO likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShoulderRoll
    replied
    The Super Bowl is free.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slip jab
    replied
    I’m purchasing at this price point to send haymon a message with his over priced trash events. Hopefully it’s a grand slam event good luck. Everyone should buy this because it will create a new trend
    Sheikh Sheikh likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elheath
    replied
    Fortunately I'm too used to watching the likes of Inoue and Nakatani and Ioka and such fight for free LEGALLY that I can never understand those arguing that $90 PPV are worth it or not and justifying stealing to begin with.

    My answer would be to make them all ******able for free legally with ads or something.
    Sheikh Sheikh No look hook Slip jab like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sheikh
    replied
    These guys are not cognizant of what's going on out there. There's a reason that people aren't buying pay-per-views anymore. The fights are not competitive anymore. That is why people are forced to steal. Ppv used to be for the top and best Elite fights now they are junk. You have a a Fighter fighting a d fighter where everyone knows the result. Saudi cards are worth it. I don't mind paying for those.

    El_Feroz99 El_Feroz99 likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • wrecksracer
    replied
    lol ridiculous: "“You have to remember,” Taffet said, “that pay-per-view boxing is primarily viewed like a Super Bowl party, where six, eight, 10 people get together and spend the evening together and watch a fight. So, $80 for a fight on a Saturday night when you’ve got 10 people together is actually much less than the cost of a movie ticket for each person.​" This line of thinking drove boxing fans to illegal ******ing by making every single decent fight a PPV.
    El_Feroz99 El_Feroz99 likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • brettWall
    replied
    These are useless articles when you're not addressing fake, exaggerated, manufactured PPV reports. Why are there reports only on PBC fights? Where are Turki's PPV numbers? Aren't they supposed to sell more because they're cheaper? Where are GBP's PPV numbers? Where are TR's numbers? Where are MR's? Why are there no articles about this?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP