Originally posted by hugh grant
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: The case for Tyson Fury to stay retired
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by takenotes View PostFury's claim to fame was beating a 39 year old Klitschko and a trilogy with Wilder, who to be honest was a one trick pony and could not box. He almost lost to that guy. Other than that, who has he really beat? He almost lost against a guy who never boxed before, fought a shot Chisora 3 times and other guys like Whyte were compete garbage. When he finally fought someone good, he lost twice against a guy 6" shorter and 60 lbs lighter.
Fury's biggest advantage was his height but he had no power.
SteveTheStav likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by StephenM View Post
Not sure what he would buy with more money? If he was'nt s t u pid with his money he must be rich beyond his wildest dreams.
One last win might tempt him but what's the point really? If he fights a soft touch we already know he's going to win, and if he takes on a threat he might lose or get hurt.
Personally, I'd have retired a long time ago. Once I got 10 or 20 million in the bank I couldn't see the point in
getting punched in the face.SteveTheStav likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Fury suffers from severe mood swings. He is up today and then down tomorrow. Next week he would announce that he was never retiring and fight Anthony Joshua at Wembley; Perhaps sometime in the late spring of this year.SteveTheStav likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostHe's ruined legacy with Francis ngannou and usyk loss. Now he needs salvage operation by beating josh and ddd.
Always says there's someone more to fight? Fury s not had a 100 fight career like duran, so what's wrong with 2 more?
Nobody asked you to wait 10 years to fight josh. If you don't want Josh fight ddd first, the man who best josh.
Actually, best josh first, so at least you've equalled what ddd didSteveTheStav likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
I agree that the fight vs Ngannou did some harm to Fury's legacy, especially when AJ later destroyed Frances in two rounds. But the Usyk losses didn't ruin his legacy at all. He fought the best in the division and lost two competitive fights. There's no shame in that.
I mean foreman and frasier probably weren't best of era too but they were nobodies fool, and neither is fury. I like fury.SUBZER0ED likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Tyson Fury is trolling us all. He shall return. He has too much fight left him in not too.
I repeated this in an earlier post but Fury has never been over matched or even decisively defeated in his entire career.
He’s never been KO, stopped or even beaten up in the ring before. His only losses came from a man who was both exceptional and with a special talent; Which was Okeksandr Usyk.
Likewise, even those two fights were close. Many boxing fans believed he won both of the them as well.Last edited by champion4ever; 01-15-2025, 03:47 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostTyson Fury is trolling us all. He shall return. He has too much fight left him not too.
I repeated this in an earlier post but Fury has never been over matched or even decisively defeated in his entire career.
He’s never been KO, stopped or even beaten up in the ring before. His only losses came from a man who was both exceptional and with a special talent; Which was Okeksandr Usyk.
Likewise, even those two fights were close. Many boxing fans believed he won both of the them as well.
Likewise, even those two fights were close. Many boxing fans believed he won both of the them
I would love to see this fact
I’ve never heard any boxing analysts say that
Not one mentioned that Fury deserved any of those fights
I call bullchit on this one
Didn't have a dog and really dislike everything about Fury
He's the only one who thought he wonbilleau2 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment