Boots Suks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lennox Lewis and Wladimir Klitschko differ on Oleksandr Usyk-Tyson Fury II
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
Exactly! And that's what Lennox suggested Fury should have attempted. Instead of using his size, reach and weight advantages, he tried to outbox a man who made his career outboxing 40% of his opponents.
But sometimes fury sparring partners say fury is the best they sparrred?And they sparred both usyk and fury?
Made me think fury could do well in any rematch
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View PostAnd yet again, we see the same old nonsensical line of “Lewis, who defeated every man he faced in the pros,”.
Lewis got knocked the phück out by Rahman and McCall. Both perennial flash in the pan journeymen. To use those words is to try to subtly hide the losses Lewis suffered.
Calzaghe, Floyd, Andre Ward, Marciano and Boots defeated every man they faced. That is an absolute statement.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
Yeh, maybe in a 3rd fight fury could win if he takes lennox advice?
But sometimes fury sparring partners say fury is the best they sparrred?And they sparred both usyk and fury?
Made me think fury could do well in any rematch
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluemax View PostA great smaller fighter always beats a fat taller fighter. Fury beat a lot of smaller decent but not great fighters because of his size. He finally met a REAL boxer who even though lacked size out boxed him twice! That's why the sport is called boxing and not fighting! If Fury was in any other weight class where he was forced to fight same size fighters he'd be nothing but a journeyman to top 20 fighter. He fared better as a heavyweight because he was so much bigger than the current group of slow plodding , poorly skilled fighters he was in against. Heck a big MMA fighter had him down
It's as if you fight to your attributes and strengths, who would've of ever guessed!? And unsurprisingly there is always ways to overcome them
Comment
-
Originally posted by techliam View Post
Boots faced van Heerden, which ended in a no contest
Faced him but didn’t defeat him
Such a strange, random choice to mention Boots and he’s not even a valid example
I think Ricardo Lopez might be the only guy to truly defeat everyone he ever faced? And I'm not even sure about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View PostAnd yet again, we see the same old nonsensical line of “Lewis, who defeated every man he faced in the pros,”.
Lewis got knocked the phück out by Rahman and McCall. Both perennial flash in the pan journeymen. To use those words is to try to subtly hide the losses Lewis suffered.
Calzaghe, Floyd, Andre Ward, Marciano and Boots defeated every man they faced. That is an absolute statement.
You could've listed anyone who's just turned pro and still has their 0 in the last couple of years and it'd be equivalent to that shíthouse.Last edited by Boro; 12-23-2024, 10:00 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by archiemoore1 View Post
Floyd lost the 1st Castillo fight and possibly the 1st Maidana fight. Ward lost the 1st Kovalev fight. Marciano lost the 1st fight against Tiger Ted Lowry. Boots beat the SH...T out of Van Heerden. Ask Van Heerden, he's a very honest fella
And Oscar LOST to Felix Sturm
And Holyfield lost to Lewis
And PAC lost multiple to Marquez
And Canelo lost to GGG
And Chavez lost to Sweet Pea
And Williams lost to Lara
Bradley lost to PAC
It appears only Floyd gets scrutinized for his close fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boro View Post
Why on earth did you put a stiff like Boots amongst those names, he's not even done a thing to warrant lacing their boots (pun intended).
You could've listed anyone who's just turned pro and still has their 0 in the last couple of years and it'd be equivalent to that shíthouse.
You are making my point for me. Without context, Boots is just like Lennox because he’s defeated everyone he’s ever faced.
Comment
Comment