Oleksandr Usyk is the greatest fighter since…
Collapse
-
Omar Narvaez and Adrian Hernandez are super underrated early career wins for Inoue in my opinion.
Narvaez had won a belt at 108 and defended it 16 times, moved up and won a belt at 112 and defended it 11 times, was the clear #1 at the time of the Inoue fight, and to that point his only loss was to Donaire at 118.
Hernandez was also the clear #1 at the time and was in his 2nd reign with 6 successful defenses when Inoue stopped him.
Someone said it earlier but Inoue doesn’t really have the contemporaries to test his greatness. That’s not his fault, but skipping over the ones who WERE there (Chocolatito, Gallo Estrada, Sor Rungvisai) and avoiding Akhmadaliev doesn’t help.
Comment
-
Yeah, something is seriously wrong with you, You just claimed Usyk beat Tyson Fury and since Tyson Fury is a bigger heavyweight it means Usyk is a ATG. Then I tell you there were tons of bigger heavyweights back in the 1990s and you response is being bigger doesn't make you better. Joe Joyce, Zhang, Bakole have never even fought for the title so how are they defining a era? Wait Tyson Fury is defining this era? Because he beat a old Wlad 10 years ago? The only bigger heavyweights who won titles in this era are Tyson Fury who is 6'7 and fat, Anthony Joshua and Deontay Wilder who is a natural 210 pound guy, Lance Whitaker, Michael Grant, Henry Akinwande, Jorge Luis Gonzales ect were all bigger and the reason they didn't win the title was because they fought better people. Each of these guys were considered top heavyweights regardless of what you want to believe. But you could also add 6'6 270 pound guys like Jameel McCline but you could also mention the tons of 6'4 to 6'4 1/2 guys like Andrew Golota, Rid**** Bowe, Lennox Lewis etc. But yeah since Tyson Fury, Wilder, and Joshua were champions since 2010 it clearly means there are far bigger heavyweights today.
Yep you are clearly mentally handicapped. Be a dear and don't message me again and I won't message you again
I think Usyk could definitely hang in the 90’s but I don’t see him dominating against the likes of Holyfield, Lewis, Bowe, Mike Tyson etc.Comment
-
Lol Usyk could hang with the best of the 90's? Why? Because you said so? IT is funny how none of you can answer basic questions. Who did Usyk beat in this watered down era that was so good that you now believe Uysk could hang with any half way decent fighter in the 90's? Anthony Joshua after Ruiz beat him first? So could Ruiz hang with the fighters of the 90's? If he a ATG now? Wait Usyk beat Dubois after Joe Joyce beat him first? Could Joyce hang with the best of the 90's now? Is Joyce a ATG? Wait because Usyk beat a drugged out version of Tyson Fury who has done nothing with his career besides beat 40 year old Wlad and no talent Deontay Wilder? Come on dude.Comment
-
Lol Usyk could hang with the best of the 90's? Why? Because you said so? IT is funny how none of you can answer basic questions. Who did Usyk beat in this watered down era that was so good that you now believe Uysk could hang with any half way decent fighter in the 90's? Anthony Joshua after Ruiz beat him first? So could Ruiz hang with the fighters of the 90's? If he a ATG now? Wait Usyk beat Dubois after Joe Joyce beat him first? Could Joyce hang with the best of the 90's now? Is Joyce a ATG? Wait because Usyk beat a drugged out version of Tyson Fury who has done nothing with his career besides beat 40 year old Wlad and no talent Deontay Wilder? Come on dude.Comment
-
Yes but keep in mind that you the same person that thinks a resume of prime fighters in Corrales (who ?), post-chickendance Judah and Hatton tops the resume of Usyk.Last edited by Haka; 12-22-2024, 05:13 AM.Comment
-
Yeah, something is seriously wrong with you, You just claimed Usyk beat Tyson Fury and since Tyson Fury is a bigger heavyweight it means Usyk is a ATG. Then I tell you there were tons of bigger heavyweights back in the 1990s and you response is being bigger doesn't make you better. Joe Joyce, Zhang, Bakole have never even fought for the title so how are they defining a era? Wait Tyson Fury is defining this era? Because he beat a old Wlad 10 years ago? The only bigger heavyweights who won titles in this era are Tyson Fury who is 6'7 and fat, Anthony Joshua and Deontay Wilder who is a natural 210 pound guy, Lance Whitaker, Michael Grant, Henry Akinwande, Jorge Luis Gonzales ect were all bigger and the reason they didn't win the title was because they fought better people. Each of these guys were considered top heavyweights regardless of what you want to believe. But you could also add 6'6 270 pound guys like Jameel McCline but you could also mention the tons of 6'4 to 6'4 1/2 guys like Andrew Golota, Rid**** Bowe, Lennox Lewis etc. But yeah since Tyson Fury, Wilder, and Joshua were champions since 2010 it clearly means there are far bigger heavyweights today.
Yep you are clearly mentally handicapped. Be a dear and don't message me again and I won't message you again
I already explained to you an Era is defined by its top fighters. And the top fighters during 90s aren't as big as HW of today. Which is again is a fact you chose to ignore.
Comment
-
Yes what? you talk rubbish that doesnt make sense. Ive never seen a poster jumping around so much as you, as soon as you get slapped your go off on to something else.Comment
Comment