Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Emanuel Navarrete finishes off Oscar Valdez faster this time

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Old Spice View Post
    Foster gets smoked
    I wouldn’t be so sure. Foster can box a little and he showed against Rocky Hernandez that he can dig deep and bite down if need be. Showed loads of heart in that one.

    Comment


    • #32
      Yo. Stop with the hurt hand talk. How many fighters have got in the ring with injuries over the years. Too many to count, some even won. If you lose, you lose. Stop making excuses. You fight enough fights, you are bound to lose some. Sick of fighter fans.

      Comment


      • #33
        I remember after the first fight, it seemed obvious that Navarrete clearly won. Next thing I know, Tessitore and company are telling me how we all just witnessed a Mexican classic. I guess they had to stick to the narrative after inviting Barrera and Morales and hyping it up...then they talked about running it back.

        This result is not a surprise.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by pnut901 View Post
          Looks like the old Navarette is back. He should try to get a belt at 135 again. I think that he's too much for Foster.
          Tbf I wouldn't of minded seeing Navarrete against Tank Davis instead of Lamont roach just to see stylistically how that would look because Navarrete is like a bigger stronger version of Santa Cruz and not as predictable with his punches and he gave tanks issues until he got obliterated with that one shot. But 135lbs is pretty tied up right now and who knows what's happening with Loma and the IBF title and Berynchik looks to be fighting Keyshawn Davis next so I think they'll make Navarrete vs Foster and Navarrete will beat him to unify
          Last edited by Boxing2695; 12-08-2024, 11:19 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post

            He had career, he had very career.
            Now you are quoting the author, whose original words appear to have been erased from the universe.

            I suppose this means someone is monitoring our discussions.

            From my point of view, having a very career is not only not a bad thing, it is
            better than having had no mention of a career at all.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by pnut901 View Post

              Yes sir , it certainly has that overly flowery Themistodian flavor , I'd say that it is either that or bad AI.
              Thank you, Sir, for coining this valuable term, of

              Which forever now you are the vibrant custodian

              Henceforth, through the mist, I shall be

              The teary-eyed lookout for the Themistodian

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP