Originally posted by Phase III
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Amanda Serrano wasn't given enough time
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Phase IIITaylor leads with her head in every fight. It’s a dirty tactic she’s been taught. Taylor’s holding is over the top.
Serrano stop talking about moving up weight classes. If it’s a problem STFU stay at featherweight and stop taking the bag. Also, get rid of that effin idiot coach of yours who runs his mouth, teaches you not an effin thing, and is a disgrace to the sport.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View Post
In the modern era, a trilogy is usually reserved for 1-1 records; but these girls have put on such a show in their previous encounters that no one would complain about a third fight. I certainly wouldn’t. Amanda could insist that, in order for her to agree to a trilogy, the third event be held in Puerto Rico, with at least one PR judge.
Like most people, I thought Serrano should’ve gotten the decision. Looking at the scores on Boxrec, I’m somewhat surprised to see that the fan scores only showed Amanda winning 95-94. That means the point deduction for headbutting (which I thought was questionable) was the difference. Clearly the fans thought the fight was very close. What I find very difficult to explain is how all three judges could’ve scored it for Katie after the penalty. Head-scratching.CubanGuyNYC likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
McNugget ******, Fury is massively overrated, taylor's a super basic put your head down and throw a bunch of ****ty arm punches jabroni you normally see at a tough man, but their half tard fans couldn't care less.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ELPacman View PostThese fights piss me off. It's like, what more would Serrano had to have done to get the W in either one? Obviously a KO, but it's bs. There were times I almost thought the first fight should have been stopped cause Taylor was taking such a bad beating. I thought, for sure Serrano had it in the bag by the end of the fight. When the results were announced, I couldn't help but feel sorry as hell for her and the robbery that took place.
Then this rematch happens and well, the results made me say , f**k it. They just don't ever want to give it to Serrano no matter how much better she shows herself. Then after the fight people were calling that they need a 3rd fight so bad. FOR WHAT? So that Serrano can go 0-3 robbery? Sure, it probably is a nice paycheck for her, but the results left on her record are appalling for someone that just reads a record and doesn't deep dive into the story behind a loss.
If I were her, I would say "go f**k yourselves" if they offer her a 3rd. At this point, it's easy win for Taylor who knows that as long as she stays on her feet, she's getting the W and the paycheck.
Like most people, I thought Serrano should’ve gotten the decision. Looking at the scores on Boxrec, I’m somewhat surprised to see that the fan scores only showed Amanda winning 95-94. That means the point deduction for headbutting (which I thought was questionable) was the difference. Clearly the fans thought the fight was very close. What I find very difficult to explain is how all three judges could’ve scored it for Katie after the penalty. Head-scratching.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tibburon245 View PostDon't know if headbutt was intentional, but Amanda is the better fighter overall because she moved up 2 weight classes. That is not mentioned often enough. Katie is a little quicker and a great fighter, but Amanda is a better puncher. I rate Amanda one step above Katie for history.
Leave a comment:
-
These fights piss me off. It's like, what more would Serrano had to have done to get the W in either one? Obviously a KO, but it's bs. There were times I almost thought the first fight should have been stopped cause Taylor was taking such a bad beating. I thought, for sure Serrano had it in the bag by the end of the fight. When the results were announced, I couldn't help but feel sorry as hell for her and the robbery that took place.
Then this rematch happens and well, the results made me say , f**k it. They just don't ever want to give it to Serrano no matter how much better she shows herself. Then after the fight people were calling that they need a 3rd fight so bad. FOR WHAT? So that Serrano can go 0-3 robbery? Sure, it probably is a nice paycheck for her, but the results left on her record are appalling for someone that just reads a record and doesn't deep dive into the story behind a loss.
If I were her, I would say "go f**k yourselves" if they offer her a 3rd. At this point, it's easy win for Taylor who knows that as long as she stays on her feet, she's getting the W and the paycheck.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
The financial rewards from the bout might comfort Serrano.
Ten three minute rounds would've made more sense. The two minute rounds don't give enough time for nuance and not as much of a test of stamina.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tibburon245 View PostDon't know if headbutt was intentional, but Amanda is the better fighter overall because she moved up 2 weight classes. That is not mentioned often enough. Katie is a little quicker and a great fighter, but Amanda is a better puncher. I rate Amanda one step above Katie for history.
real raw likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: