Comments Thread For: Conor Benn targets 147lbs champions but happy to go through Chris Eubank first

[Smash]

What story broke? There is no story, it doesn't exist.

You're just flat out lying about it and I've already told you that so I'm confused as to why you're still doing it.
.

i remember there were articles about the story when eggie was cleared with people speculating about what is going on, for example

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/oth...ts/ar-AA1qWk4Y

[JeBron Lamez]

On Boots last performances Benn rips his head off

Never seen Eggs Bennedict fight, huh?

[Smash]

What story broke? There is no story, it doesn't exist.

You're just flat out lying about it and I've already told you that so I'm confused as to why you're still doing it.

I know you don't like Conor Benn, neither do I, I can't stand the guy but the truth is the truth and what you are doing here is flat out lying.

There were lots of chatter about it even on this web site

"According to sources for the Daily Mail, Benn’s lawyers argued that UKAD had no jurisdiction to preside over drug samples collected by VADA."

https://www.boxingscene.com/warren-o...ppeals--177177

[IronDanHamza]

There were lots of chatter about it even on this web site

"According to sources for the Daily Mail, Benn’s lawyers argued that UKAD had no jurisdiction to preside over drug samples collected by VADA."

https://www.boxingscene.com/warren-o...ppeals--177177

So again you've just doubled down on something that doesn't exist. Why?

There is no "story" of jurisdiction being the reason he won that first hearing vs UKAD. None. Zero.

You've posted articles of people SPECULATING. There is no story that "broke" where anyone from any party involved (NAPD, UKAD, BBBoC, Conor Benn or Chris Eubank) that confirmed or even implied that jurisdiction has anything to do with it. That includes "Benn's Lawyer" like the Daily Mail has falsely claimed there.

So you saying that Benn was happy about a "jurisdiction loophole" is a lie. It's patently false so I don't know why you keep echo'ing it.

[Smash]

So again you've just doubled down on something that doesn't exist. Why?

There is no "story" of jurisdiction being the reason he won that first hearing vs UKAD. None. Zero.

You've posted articles of people SPECULATING. There is no story that "broke" where anyone from any party involved (NAPD, UKAD, BBBoC, Conor Benn or Chris Eubank) that confirmed or even implied that jurisdiction has anything to do with it. That includes "Benn's Lawyer" like the Daily Mail has falsely claimed there.

So you saying that Benn was happy about a "jurisdiction loophole" is a lie. It's patently false so I don't know why you keep echo'ing it.

idk i give up with u

we DONT HAVE ANY FACTS as to why eggie was cleared & why ukad won their appeal (must be a reason) & why he was cleared again, its all SPECULATION until we get some facts, there were reports on this site and online and in newspapers that eggies lawyers were using the jurisdiction angle to try to get off, since we have NO FACTS this speculation is just as good an yours or anyones elses speculation, its not lies as u said, u said there was NO STORY but there WAS A STORY at the time

[thack]

Why do you keep repeating this lie? I don't get it. You've had it explained to you ad nasuem yet you continue to flat out lie.

What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?

He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.

What part are you not understanding?

Is it glue your'e on ? Sounds like the board should have you on strict liability ..

[IronDanHamza]

idk i give up with u

we DONT HAVE ANY FACTS as to why eggie was cleared & why ukad won their appeal (must be a reason) & why he was cleared again, its all SPECULATION until we get some facts, there were reports on this site and online and in newspapers that eggies lawyers were using the jurisdiction angle to try to get off, since we have NO FACTS this speculation is just as good an yours or anyones elses speculation, its not lies as u said, u said there was NO STORY but there WAS A STORY at the time

Erm no, you are making a claim here, not me.

You are making the claim, that Benn "found out a jurisdiction loophole" and was "happy about it" that is a LIE.

The burden of proof is on you to back up that claim with evidence and there is ZERO. "Speculation" is not evidence, it's actually the opposite of evidence.

You've also made a claim, and doubled down again, that there was a "story" that broke that Benn won his hearing due to a Jurisdiction loophole. That, is not true. There is no story of that being the case and no party involved has ever said that, or even implied it.

So what you need to do is stop lying, and stick to what actually happened.

[IronDanHamza]

Is it glue your'e on ? Sounds like the board should have you on strict liability ..

Why don't you actually address what's being said?

What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?

He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.

What part are you not understanding?

[Smash]

Erm no, you are making a claim here, not me.

You are making the claim, that Benn "found out a jurisdiction loophole" and was "happy about it" that is a LIE.

The burden of proof is on you to back up that claim with evidence and there is ZERO. "Speculation" is not evidence, it's actually the opposite of evidence.

So what you need to do is stop lying, and stick to what actually happened.

he may well have found a jurisdiction loophole and IF HE DID im sure he was very happy about it, if u dont like my opinion on stuff then dont read it, until we have facts its ALL SPECULATION

[thack]

Why don't you actually address what's being said?

What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?

He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.

What part are you not understanding?

I'm afraid you'e got this totaly around your bollocks . Benn's problem throughout has been that he hasn't engaged with the board and tried to back door it through the different routes .It seems everyone is aware of this except you ... I don't want to hear from you again , go and bug someone else.