Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: O'Shaquie Foster beats Robson Conceicao, this time officially

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Airborne
    replied
    Somebody in Foster's camp needs to tell him to lose that ****** ponytail! I don't know why Conceicao didn't hit him every time Foster tried to brush it away! Anyone fighting him just s to wait until he lifts his glove to brush it away which isn't too hard since it was obvious whenever Foster was going to raise his glove!

    Leave a comment:


  • Thatmanox
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post

    No way did Conceicao win this fight. No damn way.
    Conceicao was up 8-1 through 9 rounds lmao. Foster is trash, and couldn’t even convincingly win against a C level gatekeeper who’s never won any big fight. Both are limited upper C class fighters who are nothing more than gatekeepers. Foster clearly lost even though Conceicao died off, in some of the late rounds. It made it even worse listening to Bradley try not to be favoring foster, yet he still glazed him off.
    bimhead bimhead likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • famicommander
    replied
    Originally posted by Elheath View Post
    Really? The first fight yes but this one was a Robson win IMO. Not a crazy gap like the first fight that Foster obviously should've won but if this was the first fight I would say it was a Robson win. I have a feeling the judges were being more inclined to give to Foster regardless because he was robbed the first fight.
    No way did Conceicao win this fight. No damn way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    By the way, the scoring for this fight was good. I would have thought it fair to be scored a draw or either man by 115-113. I suspect that if they do a third it will loom exactly the same with close scoring.
    BrankoB BrankoB pnut901 pnut901 like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joseph
    replied
    I nearly zoned out twice and by the end of it, I no longer cared to see either fighter again. Robson over-clinched and Foster had zero killer instinct.
    BrankoB BrankoB likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    Decent scrap. Obviously both men are a bit limited. The matchup is about as even as you can get it in boxing so I’m guessing any fight with these two will always be close, especially given fosters propensity to not let his hands go. The Brazilian was open for right counters all night long.
    pnut901 pnut901 likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • pnut901
    replied
    I enjoyed the fight , not sure where all of the negativity is coming from. The first fight was really boring but this one was good. I didn't score it but at the end felt like Conceciao had won. It was a close fight and a point or two either way is fair.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elheath
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post
    This fight was considerably closer than the robbery last time, but Foster was the better fighter both times. Don't do a third, please.
    Really? The first fight yes but this one was a Robson win IMO. Not a crazy gap like the first fight that Foster obviously should've won but if this was the first fight I would say it was a Robson win. I have a feeling the judges were being more inclined to give to Foster regardless because he was robbed the first fight.
    bimhead bimhead likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • chicken-
    replied
    Foster is not good, flat-footed, slow, doesn't throw enough punches. Any good boxer is going to circle him and piece him up with angles.

    Leave a comment:


  • whollisboxing
    replied
    I thought it was a solid, well-contested fight and every matchup won’t be Gatti-Ward or Corrales-Castillo 1.

    I think Foster vs the winner of Valdez-Navarrette would be more entertaining due to their styles and Robson is a crafty veteran who still has something left in the tank.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP