Originally posted by famicommander
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Too many IBF leading contenders don't merit any ranking, let alone mandatory status
Collapse
-
Originally posted by frzn'ynk View Postone can only conclude, from this legacy of total BS, is that the rankings are for sale one, ones promotion simply needs to hand someone a bag of cash to purchase this access to the rankings. there can be no other explanation for something this shady, and, the correct response is to just disband this useless alphabet situation and move to something less corrupt.
Comment
-
Im sorry but Scull- Shishkin was a clear example of this specific subject with the IBF, both guys would get eaten alive by the ginger inside the square circle, Morrell or Benny may as well cut down some weight and take that belt that was literally gifted last weekend.
Comment
-
yeah IBF is trash. *** them its the 3 belt era now, no more 4 belt era. Their mandatories are complete trash, every time its some random nobody you never heard of before is the mandatory and they play hardball and take away the belt even when these guys got contractual rematches.
If you have all 3 belts that arent IBF then I consider you the unified champion still.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
It doesn't matter. Usyk became undisputed. Usually some of the belts gotta be given up so the bigger fights can be made. We've seen it time and time again. It isn't some atrocity.
It's an atrocity that the IBF even exists in the first place.
Abolish the IBF, WBA, WBC, WBO, and IBO.Poopdick likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by famicommander View Post
DuBois' wins are worthless. He beat Hrgovic, who sucks, and Joshua, whom Usyk already beat twice. Don't even bring up Miller.
Hrgovic sucks? But, where was he ranked when they fought? We know how dearly you hold those ol' rankings now, don't we?Last edited by IronDanHamza; 10-22-2024, 11:53 PM.
Comment
-
Comment