We don’t need to prove how much of the substance he took.
We already have proof that what was in his system was beyond the legal limit.
The limit is there for a reason.
If the amount of it he had in his system had no impact on his performance, it wouldn’t be banned in the first place.
That part of the argument is a non argument.
We already have proof that what was in his system was beyond the legal limit.
The limit is there for a reason.
If the amount of it he had in his system had no impact on his performance, it wouldn’t be banned in the first place.
That part of the argument is a non argument.
Comment