As a fan of CLR Bruce Rivers I know this is a good take but regarding the "fraud" part, would the contract stipulations people are mentioning also be classed as admissible evidence in such a civil case?
Also, regarding the PED's, is it possible that the fact of boxers having big teams which contain people who are trusted to administer supplements etc could actually swing the Judge towards giving Garcia the benefit of the doubt (given that the lawsuit only names Garcia & GBP)?
Also, regarding the PED's, is it possible that the fact of boxers having big teams which contain people who are trusted to administer supplements etc could actually swing the Judge towards giving Garcia the benefit of the doubt (given that the lawsuit only names Garcia & GBP)?
Comment