Manny Pacquiao Looks Stronger Than Ever in Camp

[theggamme209]

Didn't they say that too before the Marquez fight?? And look what happened!! Manny got a 1 point gift decision!! Who cares about all of this ****** ass remarks!! Everyday we hear how good or great manny who cares!!! I sure don't!!

[iloveboxing2]

Good Job MC! But Train Harder...

....You will need to train harder because if you lose,,that will be the end of your boxing career. That is the consequences of losing to a lighter boxer. I root for you MC, I have you as the underdog. Beating Pac requires speed so speed-up!

[Samadafish]

My brother who doesn't watch boxing saw a pic of cotto vs PAC fire power poster & asked me is that who cottos fighting in shock lol he said that skinny little Filipino is this a joke ? Lol he said wow boxing rly has gotten desprate lol. & kinda agree with him.
What makes all these idiots think PAC can beat cotto
cuz he beat Diaz or old ass DLH or ****ty overrated hatton ? Rly ppl get a clue PAC ain't got nottin on a better skilled stronger natrual WW I recommend ya do trow money on PAC

[str8balln]

I love how these people still see Pac is some little dude. Did you all just see Delahoya quit on his stool and Hatton get layed out with one punch. Sure DLH shouldnt of gone down in weight but that doesnt diminish the fact that Pacs punches were hurtful enough to make DLH quit.

And Hatton, sure Hatton wasnt the most skilled boxer out their but he was one tough dude. Pacman layed him out flat with one punch in the 2nd.

I cant believe alot of people are still in disbelief of Pacquiaos power. Maybe after Cotto gets layed out then people will believe it, but the naysayers will give the excuse Cotto was drained at 145. The excuses never end.!!!

hate to be those stuck up grammar police in the net....but goddamn, i'm poppin veins in my neck seein grammars like this....fck, my bad in advance but this is my pet peeve.

ive been seeing this in the forums for quite some time now....tried to snub and not notice it but goddam.....its "Should Have/ Shouldn't HAVE".....HAVE.....not "should of/shouldn't of".....

now that that's out of my system....what are we talkin bout again?

[ccl2003]

Didn't they say that too before the Marquez fight?? And look what happened!! Manny got a 1 point gift decision!! Who cares about all of this ****** ass remarks!! Everyday we hear how good or great manny who cares!!! I sure don't!!

Better get your facts straight. Marquez lost because he kissed the canvass again in their 2nd fight meriting a 10-8 round for Manny so stop claiming that it was an administrative gift in Manny's favor. You're trying to distort facts and its not healthy.

[ummid]

I do not know how more garbage we are going to read from now until November 14. Anyone can say anything good about:gay: Pacquiao, Roach can come this week and say something different, but only one thing I will say; Cotto will crush Pacquiao like an egg when hit the floor. Cotto is not De la Hoya which lost more weight than he supposed to and less Hatton which he was inflated like a balloon. Cotto will destroy Pacquiao in 6-8 rounds, just remember what I say. Also I want the press, the general public, and Las Vegas to keep Pacquiao ahead on the bets, which will give me more chance to make money in Las Vegas.

very amusing post and sig. it reminds me of a kid who just opened his first box of crayons.

[superchile]

whatever

how much did jlc to say this come on castillo is done hes no longer an elite figther i think roach is letting al this rumor float about paquiao because hes scared hes fighter my get ko

[javielo]

Just another day... and we get another ****** post about auto-motivation from Team Pacquiao...

Dont you all notice how everyday Cucaracha 'Roach' tries to convince himself that Manny has a chance against Cotto...

I cant wait I will say it again if Cotto does not win I will never come back to this forum.

[bluetuazon]

i hope Pacquiao is stronger at WW than Floyd was at LW

im sure he is...floyd cant even KO a damn lightweight...lol

[Chr0nic]

hate to be those stuck up grammar police in the net....but goddamn, i'm poppin veins in my neck seein grammars like this....fck, my bad in advance but this is my pet peeve.

ive been seeing this in the forums for quite some time now....tried to snub and not notice it but goddam.....its "Should Have/ Shouldn't HAVE".....HAVE.....not "should of/shouldn't of".....

now that that's out of my system....what are we talkin bout again?

you need to shut the **** up