Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Martinez Suspended by Nevada Commission After Positive Test

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    We know that Canelo provided restaurant receipts and even traced contaminated meat back to a specific slaughterhouse. Unless Martinez went to that extent as well then his explanation is less believable. It’s pretty simple.
    See, I told you Didn't address anything you said and just repeated the same thing again.

    HOW DO YOU KNOW MARTINEZ WASN'T TRANSPARENT is what he asked. Do you want to try answering it?

    Martinez was cleared with no ban. He used tainted meat as the reason he failed his test.

    How is that not believable to you? If Canelo's is?

    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    Conor Benn threw a lot of crap against the wall to see of any of it stuck. At one point he said he thought chicken eggs could have caused his positive tests, and that he was eating between 30 and 34 eggs a week.
    Some more of the same Did you not read what he said? Why are you just repeating the same thing again?

    Conor Benn never used that as excuse. The WBC took that upon themselves. He has made that clear.

    His solicitor has also clearly stated that his leading defense is contaminated supplments.

    Which, is just as likely and believable of an excuse as contaminated meat.

    What part of that do you not get?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

      We know that Canelo provided restaurant receipts and even traced contaminated meat back to a specific slaughterhouse. Unless Martinez went to that extent as well then his explanation is less believable. It’s pretty simple.

      Conor Benn threw a lot of crap against the wall to see of any of it stuck. At one point he said he thought chicken eggs could have caused his positive tests, and that he was eating between 30 and 34 eggs a week.
      But that's the thing Shoulder. Do you know what Martinez did or didn't provide? What extent did he go to to be cleared in a way Canelo wasn't? Do you have anything but assumption here? If so, put it forth.

      Many fighters eat plenty of eggs while in camp for protein. It's not unusual. But Benn never gave it as an excuse. He may have done some research into chicken eggs and found something. I don't know. But it was Suaiman who put the eggs excuse out there.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        See, I told you Didn't address anything you said and just repeated the same thing again.

        HOW DO YOU KNOW MARTINEZ WASN'T TRANSPARENT is what he asked. Do you want to try answering it?

        Martinez was cleared with no ban. He used tainted meat as the reason he failed his test.

        How is that not believable to you? If Canelo's is?



        Some more of the same Did you not read what he said? Why are you just repeating the same thing again?

        Conor Benn never used that as excuse. The WBC took that upon themselves. He has made that clear.

        His solicitor has also clearly stated that his leading defense is contaminated supplments.

        Which, is just as likely and believable of an excuse as contaminated meat.

        What part of that do you not get?
        He's hard work, isn't he... Haha.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

          But that's the thing Shoulder. Do you know what Martinez did or didn't provide? What extent did he go to to be cleared in a way Canelo wasn't? Do you have anything but assumption here? If so, put it forth.

          Many fighters eat plenty of eggs while in camp for protein. It's not unusual. But Benn never gave it as an excuse. He may have done some research into chicken eggs and found something. I don't know. But it was Suaiman who put the eggs excuse out there.
          Nowhere has it been mentioned that Martinez provided any evidence in his defense. If you can show that he provided restaurant receipts and traced the tainted meat to a specific slaughterhouse like Canelo did then I will admit that his excuse is as believable as Canelo’s.

          Conor Benn said what he said.

          Conor Benn 'thinks CHICKEN EGGS could have caused his two failed drugs tests'... after revealing he was eating 'between 30-34 eggs a week' in the build-up to his cancelled fight with Chris Eubank Jr
          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...ugs-tests.html

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

            Nowhere has it been mentioned that Martinez provided any evidence in his defense. If you can show that he provided restaurant receipts and traced the tainted meat to a specific slaughterhouse like Canelo did then I will admit that his excuse is as believable as Canelo’s.

            Conor Benn said what he said.

            Conor Benn 'thinks CHICKEN EGGS could have caused his two failed drugs tests'... after revealing he was eating 'between 30-34 eggs a week' in the build-up to his cancelled fight with Chris Eubank Jr
            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...ugs-tests.html
            So you have nothing but assumption where Martinez is concerned? Then just say so.

            Benn came out with this AFTER Sulaiman mentioned the eggs as the reason.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

              So you have nothing but assumption where Martinez is concerned? Then just say so.

              Benn came out with this AFTER Sulaiman mentioned the eggs as the reason.
              Do you have any proof that Martinez mounted a defense equal to Canelo’s? Yes or no?

              Who cares when Conor Benn blamed chicken eggs? The fact is he did. Now he still can’t fight in the UK and blew a chance at a Pacquiao fight.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                Do you have any proof that Martinez mounted a defense equal to Canelo’s? Yes or no?

                Who cares when Conor Benn blamed chicken eggs? The fact is he did. Now he still can’t fight in the UK and blew a chance at a Pacquiao fight.
                Er yeah he was cleared by the same people you fucking retard

                Martinez got caught with Clen, he blamed contaminated meat, and was cleared with no ban.

                This is the extent to your idiocy? You’re now literally saying the EXACT same thing is not believable as to what Canelo did?

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  Nowhere has it been mentioned that Martinez provided any evidence in his defense. If you can show that he provided restaurant receipts and traced the tainted meat to a specific slaughterhouse like Canelo did then I will admit that his excuse is as believable as Canelo’s.

                  Conor Benn said what he said.

                  Conor Benn 'thinks CHICKEN EGGS could have caused his two failed drugs tests'... after revealing he was eating 'between 30-34 eggs a week' in the build-up to his cancelled fight with Chris Eubank Jr
                  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...ugs-tests.html
                  No where in that article does Conor Benn, or anyone, say that he thinks he failed two drug tests because he ate eggs.

                  His solicitor has made it VERY CLEAR. Their main line of defence is contaminated supplements.

                  Why do you outright refuse to acknowledge that?
                  Last edited by IronDanHamza; 06-13-2024, 02:45 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Boricua181 View Post

                    Exactly! Moreover if they cause permanent injury or death, they have to be imprisoned for their intentional criminal act.
                    Thats why I said I wouldn't be surprised if the Haneys went down the criminal intent road with Ryan, surely there is a legal case that Haney could say his life was at risk, its a minefield of legality when you think about it, that's why I think its ****** when fighters talk about killing their opponent as Ryan did and then tests hot.
                    Last edited by Roadblock; 06-13-2024, 03:23 AM.
                    Boricua181 Boricua181 likes this.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                      Thats why I said I wouldn't be surprised if the Haneys went down the criminal intent road with Ryan, surely there is a legal case that Haney could say his life was at risk, its a minefield of legality when you think about it, that's why I think its ****** when fighters talk about killing their opponent as Ryan did and then tests hot.
                      I agree with you 100%, on this one Roadblock. Even though boxing is a brutal combat sport, if your talking about killing your opponent your talking intent, and that's criminal. If your taking PED's, then your enlisting the aid of an illegal substance in the furtherance of committing a crime.
                      Some on this platform might disagree with this factual statement, but if they were the victim of someone on PED's, they would understand 100%.
                      Last edited by Boricua181; 06-13-2024, 04:56 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP