At the very least he would have had him using a better jab. Not that timid, pawing, range-measuring bullcrap he pulled on Saturday.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would Mark Breland have prepared Wilder better than Malik Scott?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
I think so because Breland knew Wilder's short comings and trained him to deliver that right hand. He was not a yes man like Scott.MusoMeanderings likes this.
- Likes 1
-
No he would have poisoned wilders water pay attention
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atypicalbrit View PostNo he would have poisoned wilders water pay attentionw1cked
MusoMeanderings like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by STREET CLEANER View PostI think so because Breland knew Wilder's short comings and trained him to deliver that right hand. He was not a yes man like Scott.
The second he did something Wilder disagreed with, he was gone.
No-one was improving Wilder. Wilder wouldn't allow it.billeau2 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff PandasI think Malik gots a great boxing mind, but he clearly didn't do great with Deontay (1-3, 1KO with two non-efforts in last 2 fights). How much of that is Malik's fault or Deontay's age + being in those rough Fury fights whos to say. All massive speculation.
Comment
-
Malik and Deontay is a weird love story.
First you fake-KO the guy, then he starts coaching you and tells everyone how great you are.
That's the worst case of Stockholm syndrome since Patty Hearst!
- Likes 3
Comment
-
-
Comment