Comments Thread For: What Happened When Rematches Followed Bad Decisions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shadoww702
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2015
    • 41176
    • 4,546
    • 2,938
    • 250,035

    #11
    Originally posted by TonyRespectful

    Hahaha, you'll be grumbling to your grave ! Still salty after all these years. So sorry about that.
    Dude been CRYING forever!!! *** the media! Most of the BOXERS and Trainers had Canelo beating GGG in the 2nd fight.

    I had Canelo losing the 1st fight but not the 2nd. I'm not a hypocrite like him who has GGG shoved soo far up his ARSE he got ggg cum on his brain.

    Comment

    • Shadoww702
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 41176
      • 4,546
      • 2,938
      • 250,035

      #12
      Originally posted by famicommander
      Few grumbled at Canelo vs GGG II?

      GGG got robbed blind in that fight just like the first one. And the vast majority of media scorecards were for Golovkin.
      Nope! I walked right up and got my $$$$$. But hey I can probably find some tickets that bet ggg. Go collect! When they knock you upside the head when you show up with your crayon colored scorecard having ggg winning every round 13-6 I'm gonna laugh my ass off

      Comment

      • Shadoww702
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2015
        • 41176
        • 4,546
        • 2,938
        • 250,035

        #13
        Originally posted by famicommander
        Few grumbled at Canelo vs GGG II?

        GGG got robbed blind in that fight just like the first one. And the vast majority of media scorecards were for Golovkin.
        I've seen your scorecards and they are st8t DOG sht buried in more DOG sht. You have no damn clue.

        1st your too emotional so we ALL know you had your scorecard filled out the night before.

        2nd this is u watching the fight

        Screenshot_20240523_114958_**********
        Last edited by Shadoww702; 05-23-2024, 11:52 AM.

        Comment

        • Shadoww702
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2015
          • 41176
          • 4,546
          • 2,938
          • 250,035

          #14
          Originally posted by TonyRespectful

          Hahaha, you'll be grumbling to your grave ! Still salty after all these years. So sorry about that.
          Haha that clown probably didn't even give Canelo 1 round.

          All 10-8 Ggg
          11-7 ggg 2 or 3 rounds for good measure...

          I mean look how emotional he is already and the fight was YEARS ago. He must of lost a LOT of $$$$$

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #15
            Originally posted by Casualfanboy

            It might be your thing, but not everyone enjoys being cucked.
            IDK about that??? You call yourself a boy??? You like to watch other men please your girl don't ya!

            Like you do in the bedroom leave boxing talk to the REAL men.

            Comment

            • TheOneAboveAll
              Supreme Arbiter
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2022
              • 2533
              • 1,487
              • 1,628
              • 0

              #16
              GGG 116-112 Canelo (or wider)
              GGG 115-113 Canelo
              Canelo 116-112 GGG

              Comment

              • ELPacman
                LEGENDARY
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 10445
                • 1,854
                • 144
                • 34,372

                #17
                I have no problem with rematches that deserve it. Usyk-Fury. Winning by a split decision? Deserve it. Spence-Crawford? A brutal beatdown every round until the end? Why see it again?

                The idea that a fighter can turn around a devastating loss completely means you can pretty much bring into question any matchup in history where one fighter beat the other brutally and say, oh well, he had a bad night, an off night. If they rematched, it will surely be different! It makes the meaning of winning and winning in devastating fashion pointless since you could expect an alternate outcome in a rematch. I don't want to think that way, nor do I want to see rematches of those kinds. If a fighter lost and lost brutally, let's say the other guy was better and move on in life.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP