Comments Thread For: What Happened When Rematches Followed Bad Decisions?
Collapse
-
-
Nope! I walked right up and got my $$$$$. But hey I can probably find some tickets that bet ggg. Go collect! When they knock you upside the head when you show up with your crayon colored scorecard having ggg winning every round 13-6 I'm gonna laugh my ass offComment
-
1st your too emotional so we ALL know you had your scorecard filled out the night before.
2nd this is u watching the fight
Screenshot_20240523_114958_**********
Last edited by Shadoww702; 05-23-2024, 11:52 AM.Comment
-
All 10-8 Ggg
11-7 ggg 2 or 3 rounds for good measure...
I mean look how emotional he is already and the fight was YEARS ago. He must of lost a LOT of $$$$$Comment
-
Comment
-
-
I have no problem with rematches that deserve it. Usyk-Fury. Winning by a split decision? Deserve it. Spence-Crawford? A brutal beatdown every round until the end? Why see it again?
The idea that a fighter can turn around a devastating loss completely means you can pretty much bring into question any matchup in history where one fighter beat the other brutally and say, oh well, he had a bad night, an off night. If they rematched, it will surely be different! It makes the meaning of winning and winning in devastating fashion pointless since you could expect an alternate outcome in a rematch. I don't want to think that way, nor do I want to see rematches of those kinds. If a fighter lost and lost brutally, let's say the other guy was better and move on in life.Comment
Comment