Comments Thread For: Invoking Rematch Clause A Strong Legacy Play By Fury

[TheWinners]

Loud mouth and cheat Fury has no legacy to fight for anymore. He's been disgraced in his last two fights. He got knocked down by a novice and rag-dolled by a guy he called a middleweight.

Not to talk about his disgraceful statement after he has lost to Usyk. All he's been doing for years was damaging the image of the sport inside and outside the ring. And his excuse was worse than Wilder’s. Usyk won the fight because of the war in Ukraine, he said. If I were Usyk I would tell him to kiss my Ukrainian arse for the rematch.

He got hurt by a good shot and still made it to the final bell vs Usyk. He won majority of the rounds in many boxing analysts opinions. You're talking like he was dominated.

I really don't think he took that Ngannu fight seriously. But so what. Those are HWs. Even sorry ones can catch you and knock you down.

I don't agree that they gave it to Usyk because of the war. But Fury does and I don't think it's disgraceful. Definitely controversial or not popular, but its just an opinion.

[TheWinners]

Happy New Year lad! Total delusional. Showboating doesn't win you a round. Fury won at best 4 rounds, 3, 4,5 and 6 which comes down to Usyk 8 plus knock down what should have been a TKO or outright KO. If the rematch actually happens he will get properly knocked out.

Most ring observers had Fury up comfortably before the 9th round. So did the Sportsbooks. Somehow one knockdown took away all the earlier rounds he won.

If you bet the fight, you could watch the cash out option from round to round. It gives you an idea of who the books believed would win. Up until the 9th my cash out was at profit. They only offer that when it's a strong possibility they'll have to pay you the full amount.

Now once they removed a reasonable cash out number I figured it was because they believed Fury wouldn't make it to the final bell. The question is how do you have a guy comfortably ahead, he loses one round, now he's losing the whole fight?

I believe the article claimed Fury had a 5-2 edge going into the 8th round. 2 judges scored similar with one giving Fury a 4-3 edge. I question the integrity of these scores. But it still was a close fight. Fury isn't wrong in believing he should've won or at worst it was a draw.

Only idiot beer drinking casuals would judge a whole fight based off one bad round. But apparently the books also agreed that Fury had no chance to win after the 9th round. Seems to me the powers that be wanted the rematch to happen. And Usyk helped that case with the dominating 9tn round. Which gave them an excuse to give Usyk the fight.

[BronxPride67]

I say that Fury did not win all of the early rounds but he did win some, but bottom line is that he was saved by the referee in the ninth- Usyk beat him once and he'll do it again, just like he did to the other Brit( A.J) if I was Usyk i wouldn't even give him the time of day- you lost and thats that!!!

[MMegatron]

Yes, I get that. He boxed beautifully from rounds 4 through 7. He looked like a Heavyweight version of Willie Pep.

My only problem with that style is that it tends to fatigue him. He fought the same way in Fury/Wilder I and got a Draw and on Saturday he fought the same style against Usyk and lost.

When he fights from a distance he becomes vulnerable. When he is not moving his head or legs; He becomes a stationary target.

To the point where his opponents can get full leverage on their punches.

good analysis - suppose all the pints won’t help him there either

[PRvazquez]

Most ring observers had Fury up comfortably before the 9th round. So did the Sportsbooks. Somehow one knockdown took away all the earlier rounds he won.

If you bet the fight, you could watch the cash out option from round to round. It gives you an idea of who the books believed would win. Up until the 9th my cash out was at profit. They only offer that when it's a strong possibility they'll have to pay you the full amount.

Now once they removed a reasonable cash out number I figured it was because they believed Fury wouldn't make it to the final bell. The question is how do you have a guy comfortably ahead, he loses one round, now he's losing the whole fight?

I believe the article claimed Fury had a 5-2 edge going into the 8th round. 2 judges scored similar with one giving Fury a 4-3 edge. I question the integrity of these scores. But it still was a close fight. Fury isn't wrong in believing he should've won or at worst it was a draw.

Only idiot beer drinking casuals would judge a whole fight based off one bad round. But apparently the books also agreed that Fury had no chance to win after the 9th round. Seems to me the powers that be wanted the rematch to happen. And Usyk helped that case with the dominating 9tn round. Which gave them an excuse to give Usyk the fight.

Fight was over in the 9nth. TKO. Just please stop idolizing Fury. You are not a boxing fan

[Toffee]

Most ring observers had Fury up comfortably before the 9th round. So did the Sportsbooks. Somehow one knockdown took away all the earlier rounds he won.

That's how zero fights have been scored. Including this one.

Usyk won the 8th comfortably. And the 2nd beyond reasonable doubt.

So did you have it 6-2 after 8? That would mean that you scored in Fury's favour for the close rounds 1,3,4,7. It's a hell of a bias to keep coming to the conclusion that Fury won every close round.

Personally I had Usyk winning 1,2,7,8. So 4-4 going into the 9th where he won 10-8 before closing the show. I don't think that's outlandish at all.

[Hous]

Most ring observers had Fury up comfortably before the 9th round. So did the Sportsbooks. Somehow one knockdown took away all the earlier rounds he won.

If you bet the fight, you could watch the cash out option from round to round. It gives you an idea of who the books believed would win. Up until the 9th my cash out was at profit. They only offer that when it's a strong possibility they'll have to pay you the full amount.

Now once they removed a reasonable cash out number I figured it was because they believed Fury wouldn't make it to the final bell. The question is how do you have a guy comfortably ahead, he loses one round, now he's losing the whole fight?

I believe the article claimed Fury had a 5-2 edge going into the 8th round. 2 judges scored similar with one giving Fury a 4-3 edge. I question the integrity of these scores. But it still was a close fight. Fury isn't wrong in believing he should've won or at worst it was a draw.

Only idiot beer drinking casuals would judge a whole fight based off one bad round. But apparently the books also agreed that Fury had no chance to win after the 9th round. Seems to me the powers that be wanted the rematch to happen. And Usyk helped that case with the dominating 9tn round. Which gave them an excuse to give Usyk the fight.

It was a close fight, but even if you pretend the KD didn't happen, Usyk won and would have been robbed had the cards gone the other way.

[TheWinners]

Fight was over in the 9nth. TKO. Just please stop idolizing Fury. You are not a boxing fan

Stfu clown. It wasn't over in the 9th. You're too ****ing ****** to process what happened. The ref actually made it worse for Fury by not calling a knockdown earlier. It allowed him to continue to get battered. If when the first time he fell against the ropes it was called a knockdown, he would've had time to recover. Instead the ref didn't call the knockdown and Usyk kept landing. Which in turn almost ended the fight. You ever heard of the term take a knee? The ref could've saved Fury some punishment by calling the first knockdown which wouldve been equivalent to taking a knee. I hate little internet b'xxtches like you that come and talk ****, you dont know ****. You must be one of them beer drinking idiots. Hit close to home huh?

[TheWinners]

That's how zero fights have been scored. Including this one.

Usyk won the 8th comfortably. And the 2nd beyond reasonable doubt.

So did you have it 6-2 after 8? That would mean that you scored in Fury's favour for the close rounds 1,3,4,7. It's a hell of a bias to keep coming to the conclusion that Fury won every close round.

Personally I had Usyk winning 1,2,7,8. So 4-4 going into the 9th where he won 10-8 before closing the show. I don't think that's outlandish at all.

You didn't read what I wrote. I said most observers had Fury up by at least 2 rounds going into the 8th. So did the actual scorecards except one that had him up 4-3. Every card had Fury up going into the 8th. 2 judges by 3 rounds.

[Lupara]

Brilliant mind games from Fury