Running jabbing and clinching is NOT boxing!!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2fast2strong
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2014
    • 1306
    • 317
    • 31
    • 13,329

    #11
    Originally posted by fifth_root
    Wladimir Klitschko became ATG that way. He is the greatest Greco-Roman wrestler in the history of boxing, apart from being one of the top cheaters.

    Running and jabbing is fine, it could be boring, but it is legal. Doing some clinch is also fine but it depends on whether you want to grab and/or lean over the opponent or you do it only to negate your opponent's game.
    I must admit I enjoyed when Wladimir fought most of the time but Wladimir Klitschko vs. Alexander Povetkin was absolutely disgraceful

    That has to go down as the most cowardly and dirty heavyweight title defenses in the history of the sport

    Wlad almost shat himself he fought so cowardly

    And I remember I was excited to see the two gold medalists go at it, what an ultimate disappointment that was

    Wlad should of been disqualified without question
    Last edited by 2fast2strong; 04-07-2024, 08:31 AM.

    Comment

    • ippo
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2006
      • 3467
      • 332
      • 55
      • 22,846

      #12
      Originally posted by fifth_root
      Wladimir Klitschko became ATG that way. He is the greatest Greco-Roman wrestler in the history of boxing, apart from being one of the top cheaters.

      Running and jabbing is fine, it could be boring, but it is legal. Doing some clinch is also fine but it depends on whether you want to grab and/or lean over the opponent or you do it only to negate your opponent's game.
      Not just him who added the clinch and holding as part of their game. Bhop,pacquiao,haney,Ward,Mayweather, all these guys did it. Its terrible the state of boxing where clinching/holding is allowed to this extent. I don't mind if they clinch as long as you allow infighting. But refs these days as soon as a clinch is initiated the ref comes and breaks them up and totally resets the action and giving back the advantaged to the longer reach fighter. Almost no ref is taking away points, sure they will warn a million times but almost never take points away.

      Comment

      • BodyBagz
        The Stuff Of Nightmares
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2020
        • 29780
        • 6,043
        • 6,437
        • 108,454

        #13
        One name spells doom for the whole sport ?!?!?

        Nope

        Comment

        • Regge
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2022
          • 5841
          • 1,852
          • 2,465
          • 0

          #14
          Originally posted by BodyBagz
          One name spells doom for the whole sport ?!?!?

          Nope
          Haney, Shakur, Hitchens and the new breed to name a few like Keyshawn.

          It's not just "one name ".

          Comment

          • N/A
            BANNED
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2023
            • 1075
            • 364
            • 711
            • 0

            #15
            Originally posted by ippo

            But refs these days as soon as a clinch is initiated the ref comes and breaks them up and totally resets the action and giving back the advantaged to the longer reach fighter.
            True. Or they completely disregard the excessive clinching.

            Comment

            • BodyBagz
              The Stuff Of Nightmares
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2020
              • 29780
              • 6,043
              • 6,437
              • 108,454

              #16
              Originally posted by Regge

              Haney, Shakur, Hitchens and the new breed to name a few like Keyshawn.

              It's not just "one name ".
              Watch fighters you like.
              It's like saying you hate Michael Bay movies.
              Simple solution is to not watch his movies.

              Boxing will be ok

              Comment

              • FinitoxDinamita
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 16104
                • 2,214
                • 2,185
                • 281,604

                #17
                Originally posted by fifth_root
                Wladimir Klitschko became ATG that way. He is the greatest Greco-Roman wrestler in the history of boxing, apart from being one of the top cheaters.

                Running and jabbing is fine, it could be boring, but it is legal. Doing some clinch is also fine but it depends on whether you want to grab and/or lean over the opponent or you do it only to negate your opponent's game.
                What about just grabbing without running like John Ruiz did? That man was so excruciatingly boring the most gratifying bout he’s been in was when Tua almost murdered him.

                Comment

                • N/A
                  BANNED
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2023
                  • 1075
                  • 364
                  • 711
                  • 0

                  #18
                  Originally posted by FinitoxDinamita

                  What about just grabbing without running like John Ruiz did? That man was so excruciatingly boring the most gratifying bout he’s been in was when Tua almost murdered him.
                  Excessive clinching is painful to watch, no matter the style.

                  Comment

                  • SweetPbfAli
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 3291
                    • 794
                    • 798
                    • 28,865

                    #19
                    I'm not a fan of excessive clinching but a clinch doesn't have to be successful. There's is a counter for everything mentioned, it's on the fighter to stop those things.

                    In other words, STFU.

                    Comment

                    • djtmal
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 12278
                      • 1,201
                      • 11
                      • 39,097

                      #20
                      Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
                      I'm not a fan of excessive clinching but a clinch doesn't have to be successful. There's is a counter for everything mentioned, it's on the fighter to stop those things.
                      So why have a ref then.

                      Excessive clinching/holding is supposed to get checked by the ref by taking points.

                      In football when you hold the ref throws the flag and the infraction is penalized immediately.

                      The ref is monitoring two guys only I find it hard to believe he can't see a guy excessively holding.
                      Last edited by djtmal; 04-08-2024, 08:51 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP