Comments Thread For: Hearn Unable To Update Ongoing Benn Situation Following Twist In Doping Saga

[gooderz84]

And Whyte. And Canelo and Valdez and many many more. Try hiding ya hatred a lil better than this boy.

ah bro I got no hate for Fury it was just the only back-dated ban off the top of my head. Not sure any of Whytes bans have been back-dated either? I could be wrong.

[Smash]

All we can assume here is that someone has not found Conor Benn’s excuses to be believable.

the word someone could be replaced with everyone

[ShoulderRoll]

the word someone could be replaced with everyone

It should be. But you have goobers like IronDanHamza who will still defend him.

[IronDanHamza]

It should be. But you have goobers like IronDanHamza who will still defend him.

Same thing I said to you last time you made this false claim and went running as per usual.

I have never once defended Conor Bennā€™s failed drug test.

All Iā€™ve on said this topic is correct misinformation from the likes of you and also highlight the glaring double standard from the likes of you.

[Eff Pandas]

The fact this has taken so long is an embarrassment to the sport. The UK commission handles this sh^t so ******ly. Catch a mfer, suspend a mfer for x mos/yrs, let the perpetrator attempt to reduce or reverse the situation or let them fulfill that suspension. Thats it. Simple.

[IronDanHamza]

The fact this has taken so long is an embarrassment to the sport. The UK commission handles this sh^t so ******ly. Catch a mfer, suspend a mfer for x mos/yrs, let the perpetrator attempt to reduce or reverse the situation or let them fulfill that suspension. Thats it. Simple.

Conor made the mistake of trying to fight it all the way.

He’d have been better off accepting his wrong doing (the PED being in his system) and m claiming ignorance. He’d have likely got a 6 month ban.

Instead he went all the way and in turn made an enemy with BBBoC. Especially publicly insulting them and then winning that initial hearing which I’m sure they felt embarrassed about.

They may throw the book at him now. I guess we’ll soon find out.

He did himself no favours.

[Eff Pandas]

Conor made the mistake of trying to fight it all the way.

He’d have been better off accepting his wrong doing (the PED being in his system) and m claiming ignorance. He’d have likely got a 6 month ban.

Instead he went all the way and in turn made an enemy with BBBoC. Especially publicly insulting them and then winning that initial hearing which I’m sure they felt embarrassed about.

They may throw the book at him now. I guess we’ll soon find out.

He did himself no favours.

Sure I get the Benn fook up part I'm not even bringing that up, but the main part should be simple. You got caught. You are suspended for 2yrs. That shoulda been the commission part.

The fact the UK commission never gave him a legit suspension time is why Benn was able to fight in the US. Sh^t has too much bs & red tape. It should be so much simplier on the commission side. Guilty until proven innocent with a dirty test should be the law of the land.

[IronDanHamza]

Sure I get the Benn fook up part I'm not even bringing that up, but the main part should be simple. You got caught. You are suspended for 2yrs. That shoulda been the commission part.

The fact the UK commission never gave him a legit suspension time is why Benn was able to fight in the US. Sh^t has too much bs & red tape. It should be so much simplier on the commission side. Guilty until proven innocent with a dirty test should be the law of the land.

Nah Benn could fight in the US because he claimed 100% innocence so he had a hearing and he won the hearing, so his suspension was lifted meaning he could fight anywhere in the world (pending licensing). To which has now been overturned on appeal.

If Benn had complied with them as opposed to claiming no wrong doing at all he’d have recieved an immediate ban but he instead contested it and went down the route of going against them instead. Which has happened many times before; Dillain Whyte, Tyson Fury etc but for some reason this one was much more publicised. Likely due to Benn’s public comments criticising them.

That’s where it gets tricky, because if you are genuinely innocent like Benn claims then do you comply with them and take a ban or fight your case?

Either way, it’s Benn’s handling of it that’s caused this. BBBoC have been petty as well but if Benn wanted he’d have had this behind him by now but he decided to aggressively fight it as opposed to essentially take a plea deal.

[ShoulderRoll]

Same thing I said to you last time you made this false claim and went running as per usual.

I have never once defended Conor Bennās failed drug test.

All Iāve on said this topic is correct misinformation from the likes of you and also highlight the glaring double standard from the likes of you.

Benn’s explanation was deemed to not be believable so here we are. He still can’t get licensed to fight in the UK.

[Eff Pandas]

Nah Benn could fight in the US because he claimed 100% innocence so he had a hearing and he won the hearing, so his suspension was lifted meaning he could fight anywhere in the world (pending licensing). To which has now been overturned on appeal.

If Benn had complied with them as opposed to claiming no wrong doing at all he’d have recieved an immediate ban but he instead contested it and went down the route of going against them instead. Which has happened many times before; Dillain Whyte, Tyson Fury etc but for some reason this one was much more publicised. Likely due to Benn’s public comments criticising them.

That’s where it gets tricky, because if you are genuinely innocent like Benn claims then do you comply with them and take a ban or fight your case?

Either way, it’s Benn’s handling of it that’s caused this. BBBoC have been petty as well but if Benn wanted he’d have had this behind him by now but he decided to aggressively fight it as opposed to essentially take a plea deal.

Thats all bc the UK commission is goofy in how it works. Once you are popped feel free to explain yourself but you are suspended for x mos or yrs first off & maybe we reconsider when facts come forth. Thats how it should work. This is ****** in how it actually works. Its like you caught a guy with a knife in his hands stabbing someone to death but we are letting him free as he claims innocence until all the info comes in. Your guilty until proven innocent once you pop dirty. UK commission is a sh^t show.