Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford to Retain WBO Welterweight Title Ahead of Junior Middleweight Title Tilt

[crimsonfalcon07]

As edited, that’s all that matters. Because “At The End Of The Day “, none of you “fans” shrugged your shoulders when Canelo was holding belts hostage, you attacked him,

That’s the issue. Inconsistency in response.

We believe belts are meant to be defended, otherwise drop them. It’s that simple. Fighters that don’t are part of the problem and the reason the business won’t recover.

You need to stop quacking about inconsistency.

Did the WBO order a mandatory? No. Per their rules, he's allowed to fight, especially challenging the champion up a division. Like that's literally expressly what he's doing.

Is Canelo using his WBO belt to challenge Beterbiev? No. Not even a little bit the same situation.

And do you really think Bud fighting Giovanni Santillan is better than him fighting the 154 lb unified champ? Bud defended his belt 6 times since he won his belt in 2018, not counting the Spence fight. Spence only defended his belts 5 times. IBF mandatory only once in 4 years, which is why Ennis was still mandatory after the Bud fight, because Spence was holding his belts hostage. But you weren't whining about him. You don't get to talk about inconsistency. You're possibly the most inconsistent poster on here.

[landotter]

As edited, that’s all that matters. Because “At The End Of The Day “, none of you “fans” shrugged your shoulders when Canelo was holding belts hostage, you attacked him,

That’s the issue. Inconsistency in response.

We believe belts are meant to be defended, otherwise drop them. It’s that simple. Fighters that don’t are part of the problem and the reason the business won’t recover.

Dude, stop. I said in my original post I did not care Canelo kept the titles when he fought at 175. I said it in response to your post. I am anything BUT "inconsistent" even if you disagree with what I think. Than you lump me in with everyone else on this site ignoring what I said and break your own arm patting yourself on the back from high up on Mount Judgement after hacking out four words from my response. I even AGREED with your point, and you STILL misquoted and misrepresented me.

You are the absolute definition of "toxic fan". Not even willing to appreciate those of us who may not agree with you totally, but are willing to listen to your point and at least acknowledge your logic.

Suck the fun out of this site why don't ya. Geez.......

[SweetPbfAli]

You need to stop quacking about inconsistency.

Did the WBO order a mandatory? No. Per their rules, he's allowed to fight, especially challenging the champion up a division. Like that's literally expressly what he's doing.

Is Canelo using his WBO belt to challenge Beterbiev? No. Not even a little bit the same situation.

And do you really think Bud fighting Giovanni Santillan is better than him fighting the 154 lb unified champ? Bud defended his belt 6 times since he won his belt in 2018, not counting the Spence fight. Spence only defended his belts 5 times. IBF mandatory only once in 4 years, which is why Ennis was still mandatory after the Bud fight, because Spence was holding his belts hostage. But you weren't whining about him. You don't get to talk about inconsistency. You're possibly the most inconsistent poster on here.

Nah, he consistently disparages Crawford.

[crimsonfalcon07]

Blah blah I hate Crawford blah blah "consistency* blah "facts" blah

Shut up already. You don't get to bleat about facts either, when you oh-so-conveniently leave out relevant ones.

FACT: Ennis was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford.
FACT: Spence only defended his IBF belt ONE time in 4 years, which is why Crawford was on the hook so quickly. Because SPENCE didn't fulfill his obligations.
FACT: SPENCE activated his contractual rematch clause, meaning that Bud couldn't get negotiations going until the clause expired.
FACT: Bud COULDN'T legally fight Ennis within the required timeframe because Spence had that rematch clause. We knew that before the fight happened, that Ennis would get emailed the belt because of the rematch clause. Are you going to be spewing this drivel when Hrgovic gets emailed a belt after Usyk v Fury?
FACT: Bud defended his ONE belt more times than Spence defended his 3 in the same period of time when they both won their first title. Any outstanding mandatory obligations will be inherited from SPENCE's failing to defend, thereby holding up the division.
SUPPOSITION: Bud Crawford is Leicesterage's estranged daddy.

You don't seem to understand the concept of contractual obligations. Very little has been down to Crawford's choice. GTFO with your nonsense about consistency and facts. The only thing consistent and factual is that you never miss an opportunity to spread lies about Bud and act pretentious with zero basis in reality. One of the worst posters on here.

[SweetPbfAli]

Shut up already. You don't get to bleat about facts either, when you oh-so-conveniently leave out relevant ones.

FACT: Ennis was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford.
FACT: Spence only defended his IBF belt ONE time in 4 years, which is why Crawford was on the hook so quickly. Because SPENCE didn't fulfill his obligations.
FACT: SPENCE activated his contractual rematch clause, meaning that Bud couldn't get negotiations going until the clause expired.
FACT: Bud COULDN'T legally fight Ennis within the required timeframe because Spence had that rematch clause. We knew that before the fight happened, that Ennis would get emailed the belt because of the rematch clause. Are you going to be spewing this drivel when Hrgovic gets emailed a belt after Usyk v Fury?
FACT: Bud defended his ONE belt more times than Spence defended his 3 in the same period of time when they both won their first title. Any outstanding mandatory obligations will be inherited from SPENCE's failing to defend, thereby holding up the division.
SUPPOSITION: Bud Crawford is Leicesterage's estranged daddy.

You don't seem to understand the concept of contractual obligations. Very little has been down to Crawford's choice. GTFO with your nonsense about consistency and facts. The only thing consistent and factual is that you never miss an opportunity to spread lies about Bud and act pretentious with zero basis in reality. One of the worst posters on here.

Somebody cooked here.