Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford to Retain WBO Welterweight Title Ahead of Junior Middleweight Title Tilt

[crimsonfalcon07]

Blah blah I hate Crawford blah blah "consistency* blah "facts" blah

Shut up already. You don't get to bleat about facts either, when you oh-so-conveniently leave out relevant ones.

FACT: Ennis was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford.
FACT: Spence only defended his IBF belt ONE time in 4 years, which is why Crawford was on the hook so quickly. Because SPENCE didn't fulfill his obligations.
FACT: SPENCE activated his contractual rematch clause, meaning that Bud couldn't get negotiations going until the clause expired.
FACT: Bud COULDN'T legally fight Ennis within the required timeframe because Spence had that rematch clause. We knew that before the fight happened, that Ennis would get emailed the belt because of the rematch clause. Are you going to be spewing this drivel when Hrgovic gets emailed a belt after Usyk v Fury?
FACT: Bud defended his ONE belt more times than Spence defended his 3 in the same period of time when they both won their first title. Any outstanding mandatory obligations will be inherited from SPENCE's failing to defend, thereby holding up the division.
SUPPOSITION: Bud Crawford is Leicesterage's estranged daddy.

You don't seem to understand the concept of contractual obligations. Very little has been down to Crawford's choice. GTFO with your nonsense about consistency and facts. The only thing consistent and factual is that you never miss an opportunity to spread lies about Bud and act pretentious with zero basis in reality. One of the worst posters on here.

[SweetPbfAli]

Shut up already. You don't get to bleat about facts either, when you oh-so-conveniently leave out relevant ones.

FACT: Ennis was mandatory for SPENCE, not Crawford.
FACT: Spence only defended his IBF belt ONE time in 4 years, which is why Crawford was on the hook so quickly. Because SPENCE didn't fulfill his obligations.
FACT: SPENCE activated his contractual rematch clause, meaning that Bud couldn't get negotiations going until the clause expired.
FACT: Bud COULDN'T legally fight Ennis within the required timeframe because Spence had that rematch clause. We knew that before the fight happened, that Ennis would get emailed the belt because of the rematch clause. Are you going to be spewing this drivel when Hrgovic gets emailed a belt after Usyk v Fury?
FACT: Bud defended his ONE belt more times than Spence defended his 3 in the same period of time when they both won their first title. Any outstanding mandatory obligations will be inherited from SPENCE's failing to defend, thereby holding up the division.
SUPPOSITION: Bud Crawford is Leicesterage's estranged daddy.

You don't seem to understand the concept of contractual obligations. Very little has been down to Crawford's choice. GTFO with your nonsense about consistency and facts. The only thing consistent and factual is that you never miss an opportunity to spread lies about Bud and act pretentious with zero basis in reality. One of the worst posters on here.

Somebody cooked here.