Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Working Out Ahead Of Possible Conor Benn Bout

[BodyBagz]

Not if it's Conor. He has been at 154 for 2 years, but that would also be part of the Team Pac strategy.

If Pac goes in clause free vs a legit live body, I will give him props

Not that Maravilla is beating down notable opponents, he is giving it a go.
Maybe Pac can do likewise.

[Roadblock]

Will Pac's next opponent not have to battle with the scales, I wonder.....

Not if it's Conor. He has been at 154 for 2 years, but that would also be part of the Team Pac strategy.

[BodyBagz]

Will Pac's next opponent not have to battle with the scales, I wonder.....

[Oregonian]

He prepared for Spence my man. In 2 weeks to change your strategies against an entirely different style of fighter... I'm not sayin Pac would have beat Spence either, but a last minute replacement is no good for any fighter. History has shown.

——-
Clearly not for Floyd. He has adjusted to every style he’s ever encountered.

[ELPacman]

———-

“ I know he didn't prepare for Ugas,”
These are powerful words. Is he a friend of yours?

It’s incredible to keep reading all the defence and justification of PAC’s losses from his disciples.

As much as I dislike the idea of this fight, and as much as I criticize PAC, this is a fight he can win. Benn is garbage in every sense.

He prepared for Spence my man. In 2 weeks to change your strategies against an entirely different style of fighter... I'm not sayin Pac would have beat Spence either, but a last minute replacement is no good for any fighter. History has shown.

[IronDanHamza]

Why bring the writer into it in the comment section under the article the writer wrote? Using an exact quote from said article?

You really are an absolute moron.

Er, yeah. Why? Do you not have your own brain?

You weren't responding to anyone, you asked the question when the BBBoC was going to answer the appeal. Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?

You also didn't use an exact quote either, not sure if you know what the word "exact" means.

Go stick another needle in your ass.

Weird thing to say.

Are you implying doing this is some kind of problem?

[ShoulderRoll]

I don't need to keep it moving in regards to the writer because I didn't even start in the first place You brought the writer into for some reason because you don't have your own thoughts it seems. Why would I care about the writer? That's not hypocritical because I'd say the same thing to him if he'd posted that on this message board and anyone else that posted the retarded question you did.

YOU said it, in this thread, no mention of the writer. I was responding to you and what you said. If you'd made it clear you were echoing the (incorrect) words of the writer then that's another story but why you'd do that I don't know.

You weren't responding to anyone, you asked the question when the BBBoC was going to answer the appeal. Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?

Why bring the writer into it in the comment section under the article the writer wrote? Using an exact quote from said article?

You really are an absolute moron.

Go stick another needle in your ass.

[IronDanHamza]

If you don’t much care then just STFU and keep it moving, then. Otherwise direct the same energy to the writer that you have towards me since all I am doing is responding to the exact words he wrote.

Don’t be a hypocrite about it.

I don't need to keep it moving in regards to the writer because I didn't even start in the first place You brought the writer into for some reason because you don't have your own thoughts it seems. Why would I care about the writer? That's not hypocritical because I'd say the same thing to him if he'd posted that on this message board and anyone else that posted the retarded question you did.

YOU said it, in this thread, no mention of the writer. I was responding to you and what you said. If you'd made it clear you were echoing the (incorrect) words of the writer then that's another story but why you'd do that I don't know.

You weren't responding to anyone, you asked the question when the BBBoC was going to answer the appeal. Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?

[ShoulderRoll]

If the writer is saying that the BBBoC answer the appeal then one or the other, or both, I don't much care to be honest what the writer said I wasn't responding to him I was responding to you who posted in this thread.

I don't know why you're blaming the writer, you have your own brain don't you? You didn't mention the writer in your post you just asked as to when the BBBoC are going to answer the appeal.

Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?

If you don’t much care then just STFU and keep it moving, then. Otherwise direct the same energy to the writer that you have towards me since all I am doing is responding to the exact words he wrote.

Don’t be a hypocrite about it.

[IronDanHamza]

The article says what it says.

Is the writer a ****** dumbass or just badly misinformed in your opinion? Which is it?

If the writer is saying that the BBBoC answer the appeal then one or the other, or both, I don't much care to be honest what the writer said I wasn't responding to him I was responding to you who posted in this thread.

I don't know why you're blaming the writer, you have your own brain don't you? You didn't mention the writer in your post you just asked as to when the BBBoC are going to answer the appeal.

Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?