Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Working Out Ahead Of Possible Conor Benn Bout

[Oregonian]

Please Pac, just stay retired. My last live watching of Pacquiao was against Ugas. I know he didn't prepare for Ugas, but even still, Pac who could normally figure a way to win a crappy fight just looked bad against Ugas. That's when I knew, age finally caught up with him.

This fight has zero meaning. Nobody knows who tf Conor Benn is in America or probably in the world besides the UK, lol. It's a meaningless fight for Pac against a young dude. Both will make some coin, but wtf even do it? Pac has NOTHING to prove at this point. I can only imagine, his giving personality and the leeches around him are sapping more from him than he's earning from his investments in the Ph. That said, he needs to stay away from boxing because anyone with a sane mind will tell you, it's a young man's sport.

I've accepted all of Pac's losses he earned between the ages of 18-41, but I don't need to see him brutally KO'd by some young c**t that doesn't deserve to have Pac's name on his resume with a KO.

———-

“ I know he didn't prepare for Ugas,”
These are powerful words. Is he a friend of yours?

It’s incredible to keep reading all the defence and justification of PAC’s losses from his disciples.

As much as I dislike the idea of this fight, and as much as I criticize PAC, this is a fight he can win. Benn is garbage in every sense.

[Roadblock]

It doesn’t work that way. I asked a question based on what the article said, and you jumped all over me for it. But refuse to jump all over the writer of the article because you “don’t care” about him.

That makes you a little hypocrite b-tch.

LOL when I seen you having words with that dough boy I knew where it was going, people like him are born with no standup its all ducking and weaving and looking for the spit bucket, step back and watch his conflicts on the forum no standup its all sidewinding.

[IronDanHamza]

It doesn’t work that way. I asked a question based on what the article said, and you jumped all over me for it. But refuse to jump all over the writer of the article because you “don’t care” about him.

That makes you a little hypocrite b-tch.

Er yeah because you said it. You didn't say anything about the fact the writer said it. I responded to you, because you said it on this forum. Couldn't care less about the writer because I can't respond to him. If he made a post of that level of ******ity on here like you did I'd have done the same.

But I'll bare in mind in future that you need it spelling out to you that the BBBoC aren't the ones who answer an appeal to an appeal they made to a hearing decision they lost I mean, I knew you were fucking brain dead but you take it one further here. Can't say I'm overly surprised.

And what's that Eddie Hearn crap you were talking about, since you ignored it? What appeal is Hearn supposed to have made in your mind?

[ShoulderRoll]

I don't care about the writer. I didn't respond to the writer, I responded to you, who posted in this thread about the BBBoC answering an appeal that they made

You made that decision to post that. You can think for yourself, can't you? Do you not know that the BBBoC can't answer an appeal that they made themselves to a hearing decision that they lost, or do you need to spelt out for you like the retard you are?

And what's that Eddie Hearn crap you were talking about, since you ignored it? What appeal is Hearn supposed to have made in your mind?

It doesn’t work that way. I asked a question based on what the article said, and you jumped all over me for it. But refuse to jump all over the writer of the article because you “don’t care” about him.

That makes you a little hypocrite b-tch.

[ELPacman]

Please Pac, just stay retired. My last live watching of Pacquiao was against Ugas. I know he didn't prepare for Ugas, but even still, Pac who could normally figure a way to win a crappy fight just looked bad against Ugas. That's when I knew, age finally caught up with him.

This fight has zero meaning. Nobody knows who tf Conor Benn is in America or probably in the world besides the UK, lol. It's a meaningless fight for Pac against a young dude. Both will make some coin, but wtf even do it? Pac has NOTHING to prove at this point. I can only imagine, his giving personality and the leeches around him are sapping more from him than he's earning from his investments in the Ph. That said, he needs to stay away from boxing because anyone with a sane mind will tell you, it's a young man's sport.

I've accepted all of Pac's losses he earned between the ages of 18-41, but I don't need to see him brutally KO'd by some young c**t that doesn't deserve to have Pac's name on his resume with a KO.

[IronDanHamza]

So the boxing writer isn’t ****** for posting what he did on a boxing forum? You’re a jackass.

I don't care about the writer. I didn't respond to the writer, I responded to you, who posted in this thread about the BBBoC answering an appeal that they made

You made that decision to post that. You can think for yourself, can't you? Do you not know that the BBBoC can't answer an appeal that they made themselves to a hearing decision that they lost, or do you need to spelt out for you like the retard you are?

And what's that Eddie Hearn crap you were talking about, since you ignored it? What appeal is Hearn supposed to have made in your mind?

[ShoulderRoll]

No, I'm saying you're ****** for posting on a boxing forum asking the question to when the BBBoC are going to answer an appeal that they themselves have lodged because anyone with a brain cell should know that if the BBBoC have appealed a decision that they lost then how can they be the ones who also make the decision on that appeal?



What? Eddie Hearn?

Eddie Hearn isn't appealing anything to my knowledge, no. Are you under the impression that Eddie Hearn has made an appeal of some form?

So the boxing writer isn’t ****** for posting what he did on a boxing forum? You’re a jackass.

[IronDanHamza]

So you’re saying the writer of the article is a dumbass and ****** bastard, right?

No, I'm saying you're ****** for posting on a boxing forum asking the question to when the BBBoC are going to answer an appeal that they themselves have lodged because anyone with a brain cell should know that if the BBBoC have appealed a decision that they lost then how can they be the ones who also make the decision on that appeal?

And that Eddie Hearn is not appealing to the BBBoC to allow Benn to fight in the UK?

What? Eddie Hearn?

Eddie Hearn isn't appealing anything to my knowledge, no. Are you under the impression that Eddie Hearn has made an appeal of some form?

[ShoulderRoll]

It's just semantics though isn't it. It makes no difference to the point, which is obviously the BBBoC aren't the one making any decisions here in general (outside of licensing issues), let alone on an appeal decision that they themselves lodged, to a hearing decision that they lost.

Why would you even need to read an article to know that the BBBoC obviously aren't the one's making the decision of the appeal when they are the one's who lodged the appeal? Or do you just believe everything you read?

So you’re saying the writer of the article is a dumbass and ****** bastard, right?

And that Eddie Hearn is not appealing to the BBBoC to allow Benn to fight in the UK?

[Tibburon245]

Don't come back Pac--remember what happened to Sugar Ray Leonard. Your legacy of fighting & beating the toughest guys for 2 decades is enough.