Er yeah because you said it. You didn't say anything about the fact the writer said it. I responded to you, because you said it on this forum. Couldn't care less about the writer because I can't respond to him. If he made a post of that level of ******ity on here like you did I'd have done the same.
But I'll bare in mind in future that you need it spelling out to you that the BBBoC aren't the ones who answer an appeal to an appeal they made to a hearing decision they lost I mean, I knew you were fucking brain dead but you take it one further here. Can't say I'm overly surprised.
And what's that Eddie Hearn crap you were talking about, since you ignored it? What appeal is Hearn supposed to have made in your mind?
I quoted exactly what the author said, you dumb piece of sh-t. Including what he stated about Eddie Hearn.
Try actually reading the articles that people are commenting on next time, numb nuts.
LOL when I seen you having words with that dough boy I knew where it was going, people like him are born with no standup its all ducking and weaving and looking for the spit bucket, step back and watch his conflicts on the forum no standup its all sidewinding.
His logic completely falls apart once you press him a little.
But what can you expect from a guy that claims to be a nihilist who flies to other countries to attend Satanic gatherings.
His logic completely falls apart once you press him a little.
But what can you expect from a guy that claims to be a nihilist who flies to other countries to attend Satanic gatherings.
He is reformed from all that stuff. He got sick of being the stooge holding the candles where they all take turns porking him, he didn't realize his cloak was the only one with a zipper in the back.
I quoted exactly what the author said, you dumb piece of sh-t. Including what he stated about Eddie Hearn.
Try actually reading the articles that people are commenting on next time, numb nuts.
So when you read the article did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they made, or what? Because you posted it for some unknown reason.
Not getting the Eddie Hearn stuff. What appeal is Eddie Hearn supposed to have made?
His logic completely falls apart once you press him a little.
What the fuck are you talking about You have never pressed me ever. You're a punching bag on here mate.
We're talking about logic when you just asked when the BBBoC are going to answer an appeal...That they lodged Then painting it like you're quoting the article. Do you not have your own brain or do you just follow every article you read?
He is reformed from all that stuff. He got sick of being the stooge holding the candles where they all take turns porking him, he didn't realize his cloak was the only one with a zipper in the back.
What are you implying here? That gay shit is synonymous with something I'm involved in?
I think you'd be better aiming that at ShoulderRoll and his Catholic Church because that's their thing.
So when you read the article did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they made, or what? Because you posted it for some unknown reason.
Not getting the Eddie Hearn stuff. What appeal is Eddie Hearn supposed to have made?
The article says what it says.
Is the writer a ****** dumbass or just badly misinformed in your opinion? Which is it?
Is the writer a ****** dumbass or just badly misinformed in your opinion? Which is it?
If the writer is saying that the BBBoC answer the appeal then one or the other, or both, I don't much care to be honest what the writer said I wasn't responding to him I was responding to you who posted in this thread.
I don't know why you're blaming the writer, you have your own brain don't you? You didn't mention the writer in your post you just asked as to when the BBBoC are going to answer the appeal.
Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?
If the writer is saying that the BBBoC answer the appeal then one or the other, or both, I don't much care to be honest what the writer said I wasn't responding to him I was responding to you who posted in this thread.
I don't know why you're blaming the writer, you have your own brain don't you? You didn't mention the writer in your post you just asked as to when the BBBoC are going to answer the appeal.
Did you not know that the BBBoC won't be answering an appeal that they lodged on a decision they lost when you made that post?
If you don’t much care then just STFU and keep it moving, then. Otherwise direct the same energy to the writer that you have towards me since all I am doing is responding to the exact words he wrote.
Comment