Best view of the fight AJ Francis perfect power right hand.

[Roadblock]

Figure I'd post it here for others to see as well.

The bomb drops at 21:00

Thats was good aye, thanks for posting.

[ELPacman]

Pitbulls ( real ones) were bred for gameness, that is never give in once committed, the aggression your talking about is nerve strength and it comes from all the backyard breeders that think aggression is a sign of gameness, nothing can be further from the truth and has caused so many aggressive reactive weak nerved dogs to bred and peddled to market, aggression stems from insecurity a get him before he gets me mindset, it has nothing to do with depth of commitment which is what the old breeders bred for, so many real pit dogs are easy going and will only fight if they are attacked or faced up in a pit, Ive know many that would play with other dogs in a yard, but would fight to the death inside a pit. There muscular bodies is result of athletic dogs being bred just like with Greyhounds form follows function, there is a huge amount of miss-information put out about Pit Bulls, and the irony is most putting it out have never owned one, Ive owned 100s of them.

With Black races I just think they evolved from athletic genetics, even the early ****** and Mandingos brought to America were bred for it for work and fighting, all the while fat ass white men were living of bread watching their fields grow. but yeah there are heaps of guys today that are unbelievably jacked and never worked out.

Though those are the ones I question. How can they look so jack and barely lift weights? There has to be a higher level of something in the body to reduce fat levels and increase muscle mass more than the average joe if they both don't do anything. I'd be curious to know, two dudes, same age, weight, black, white, black dude looks jacked, white dude looks normal, and what their T levels are.

I'm not in anyway trying to make this racist, I'm just honestly curious to know. Like I said, if they can barely lift and look that good, god bless them. Like I said, I work my ass off at the gym and barely look like them. Sure, makes me feel good getting compliments from old white men that I'm strong as f**k, but you won't hear women at the beach say that In fact women perceive muscular looking men as stronger, just because of the definition. They don't know much he truly lifts and probably would not even care. They see the look and associate it with being strong. It's definitely something you want more so if you want to bag the hunnies.

[Roadblock]

Though those are the ones I question. How can they look so jack and barely lift weights? There has to be a higher level of something in the body to reduce fat levels and increase muscle mass more than the average joe if they both don't do anything. I'd be curious to know, two dudes, same age, weight, black, white, black dude looks jacked, white dude looks normal, and what their T levels are.

I'm not in anyway trying to make this racist, I'm just honestly curious to know. Like I said, if they can barely lift and look that good, god bless them. Like I said, I work my ass off at the gym and barely look like them. Sure, makes me feel good getting compliments from old white men that I'm strong as f**k, but you won't hear women at the beach say that In fact women perceive muscular looking men as stronger, just because of the definition. They don't know much he truly lifts and probably would not even care. They see the look and associate it with being strong. It's definitely something you want more so if you want to bag the hunnies.

Genetics is the reason, if you were to look in their family tree the answers are there, I see it all the time with my dogs, there are different types of muscle quality and you can select for it to keep them a certain way as you progress with a breeding program, my dogs are bred like black athletes were in the beginning, power and type doesn't just happen by fluke and at some point it had to be selected for which is what Natures does with her survival of the fittest program, its all the same principles with man.

These dogs are not worked at all at the time of pics just kept in trim its a natural muscle type from selective breeding.

harvey2.jpg
Bullet-1.jpg
Moon-b.jpg
011A3914.jpg

[Quercusalba]

Genetics is the reason, if you were to look in their family tree the answers are there, I see it all the time with my dogs, there are different types of muscle quality and you can select for it to keep them a certain way as you progress with a breeding program, my dogs are bred like black athletes were in the beginning, power and type doesn't just happen by fluke and at some point it had to be selected for which is what Natures does with her survival of the fittest program, its all the same principles with man.

These dogs are not worked at all at the time of pics just kept in trim its a natural muscle type from selective breeding.

harvey2.jpg
Bullet-1.jpg
Moon-b.jpg
011A3914.jpg

Humans are not dogs you sicko. Nobody bred AJ's and Ngannou's ancestors to make them the athletes they are. Their ancestry is directly from sub-Saharan Africa which is home to the Earth's greatest genetic human diversity.

This is a ridiculous conversation, but one cannot 'breed' humans in the manner one breeds dogs. Female dogs are receptive around one year of age and within a few months can produce six (give or take) offspring. So, every year and a half produces a new generation which can increase five fold (give or take) each successive generation. Also, dogs do whatever humans tell them to do. That is, you don't seem to understand the difference between artificial selection (domestic dogs) and natural selection (tigers). Humans, or more precisely hominids, have not reproduced based solely on survival of the fittest (natural selection) since before modern humans existed. From the moment people began to care for the sick and injured, something for which there is evidence in our proto-human ancestors, survival of the fittest no longer applies to us. There have been experiments with eugenics from time to time, but AJ and Francis are in no way related to such practices.

Don't compare humans to dogs. It's farcical, and it's just a bad look.

[Roadblock]

Humans are not dogs you sicko. Nobody bred AJ's and Ngannou's ancestors to make them the athletes they are. Their ancestry is directly from sub-Saharan Africa which is home to the Earth's greatest genetic human diversity.

This is a ridiculous conversation, but one cannot 'breed' humans in the manner one breeds dogs. Female dogs are receptive around one year of age and within a few months can produce six (give or take) offspring. So, every year and a half produces a new generation which can increase five fold (give or take) each successive generation. Also, dogs do whatever humans tell them to do. That is, you don't seem to understand the difference between artificial selection (domestic dogs) and natural selection (tigers). Humans, or more precisely hominids, have not reproduced based solely on survival of the fittest (natural selection) since before modern humans existed. From the moment people began to care for the sick and injured, something for which there is evidence in our proto-human ancestors, survival of the fittest no longer applies to us. There have been experiments with eugenics from time to time, but AJ and Francis are in no way related to such practices.

Don't compare humans to dogs. It's farcical, and it's just a bad look.

Youre naive to life, Nature bred man and man bred man, as life beings there is no difference to body functions and raw materials as animals which is what we are a species of animal, why do you think they test so many pharmatuitcals on dogs and mice, I can compare people to dogs in so many genetic ways your head would spin, inheritance patterns, prepotency, traits, the way mother Nature works its all the same, I suggest you research before you post a strong opinion because I know you don't anything on the subject.

What do you think produced the blueprint to the species man, survival of the fittest evolved the type.

Natural section in dogs is survival of the fittest, just as natural selection for race dogs is select breeding from race dogs , its all the same in the way selection works.

[hhh1200]

Humans are not dogs you sicko. Nobody bred AJ's and Ngannou's ancestors to make them the athletes they are. Their ancestry is directly from sub-Saharan Africa which is home to the Earth's greatest genetic human diversity.

This is a ridiculous conversation, but one cannot 'breed' humans in the manner one breeds dogs. Female dogs are receptive around one year of age and within a few months can produce six (give or take) offspring. So, every year and a half produces a new generation which can increase five fold (give or take) each successive generation. Also, dogs do whatever humans tell them to do. That is, you don't seem to understand the difference between artificial selection (domestic dogs) and natural selection (tigers). Humans, or more precisely hominids, have not reproduced based solely on survival of the fittest (natural selection) since before modern humans existed. From the moment people began to care for the sick and injured, something for which there is evidence in our proto-human ancestors, survival of the fittest no longer applies to us. There have been experiments with eugenics from time to time, but AJ and Francis are in no way related to such practices.

Don't compare humans to dogs. It's farcical, and it's just a bad look.

Better comparison would be a shaved primate to a human in terms of natural muscle bellies.

hbe7gi2steb91.jpg?auto=webp&s=c39e75f30d018a40c8c645d29103cf373a1152fc.jpg

In terms of boxing I think they all use something other than egg whites and potatoes pre-camp

[elfag]

There are black guys that look like that naturally, and they have never been in a gym. I only just watched a funny video of a crackhead going off and he was about 45 and looked like Marvin Hagler, point is being ripped or really muscled doesn't mean PEDS, this idea stems from fans that don't have much knowledge about PEDS only what they fed by the media.

Theyre 250 and 270 pounds with almost no body fat in their mid and late 30s, theyre elite pro athletes with tens of millions of dollars in purses that can be used to buy the best non detectable peds that money can buy. they can also afford a coach who can manage all their doses, tapers, masking agents ect

They are 100% both on PEDs. come one dude

[dan-b]

Theyre 250 and 270 pounds with almost no body fat in their mid 30s, theyre elite pro atheletes with tens of millions of dollars in purses that can be used to buy the best non detectable peds that money can buy.

They are 100% both on PEDs. come one dude

What are they though? You have to be able to specify some such compounds otherwise it looks like you're citing magic.

Where did they get them also? And who do they trust to obtain them? How is the money transferred?

It's easy to cite an elaborate conspiracy but less easy to explain how it works in practice.

[TMLT87]

All 3 knockdowns were massive shots, about as hard as you can get hit. The second knockdown would have ended it if it had been on the chin.

Anyway watching it again and from that angle, I actually dont think Ngannou looked THAT bad. He was biting on the feints too much, I dont like him trying to parry shots and the jab was too lazy at times, but I dont think he looked completely hopeless like the result would suggest. AJ was just on point and deserves credit for such a sharp destructive clinical performance.

[TMLT87]

Also there seems to be some weird discussion going on in here about genetics and such.

AJ and Ngannou are obviously juiced to the ****ing gills, but thats ON TOP of obviously being high end raw athletes to begin with even before PEDs. Also, EVERYONE IS USING PEDs (well, 90+%)