Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao 'Ready to Go' for Conor Benn Fight in Saudi Arabia in May/June

[BodyBagz]

So wait, what are you saying now that it is evidence? Because you're implying there that that's evidence when you've conceded in this very thread it's not evidence. Does it need explaining again?

And just to be pedantic, the time he turned down the fight with Floyd his purse wasn't 100 million. Ironically the time he did agree to the drug testing he got around that 100 million or more.

Would you refuse to roll up your sleeve on random dates for 10 mil ?
Lie to me if you must.

[IronDanHamza]

Would you refuse to roll up your sleeve on random dates for 10 mil ?
Lie to me if you must.

I pay money to get injected with Testoterone every week so me personally, no.

Blood tests aren't nice but I pay to get my bloods done as well once a month so again personally, no.

But I can't speak for another man. Is there a point to your question?

We've established that you concede that the above isn't evidence and that there is no evidence that Pacquaio used PED's so I'm confused as to why you've repeated the same point that was already dismissed and implied that it's evidence for Pacquaio's PED use again?

[BodyBagz]

I pay money to get injected with Testoterone every week so me personally, no.

Blood tests aren't nice but I pay to get my bloods done as well once a month so again personally, no.

But I can't speak for another man. Is there a point to your question?

We've established that you concede that the above isn't evidence and that there is no evidence that Pacquaio used PED's so I'm confused as to why you've repeated the same point that was already dismissed and implied that it's evidence for Pacquaio's PED use again?

Was that a y or a n

Give Travesty my regards

[Roadblock]

I pay money to get injected with Testoterone every week so me personally, no.

Blood tests aren't nice but I pay to get my bloods done as well once a month so again personally, no.

But I can't speak for another man. Is there a point to your question?

We've established that you concede that the above isn't evidence and that there is no evidence that Pacquaio used PED's so I'm confused as to why you've repeated the same point that was already dismissed and implied that it's evidence for Pacquaio's PED use again?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in accordance with the legal definition, there is no hard evidence in the public sector as far as Im aware off, I don't recall anybody saying there was hard evidence maybe you could point out where its said I cant find it.

If you don't want to agree with the documented legal definition of evidence which is as clear as day then there is no hope for you on this.

[IronDanHamza]

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence in accordance with the legal definition, there is no hard evidence in the public sector as far as Im aware off, I don't recall anybody saying there was hard evidence maybe you could point out where its said I cant find it.

If you don't want to agree with the documented legal definition of evidence which is as clear as day then there is no hope for you on this.

Except there isn't any circumstantial evidence as already established and I have no interest in delving into the realms of absurdity with fictional legal trials in what shoulda coulda and woulda happened.

There is no evidence that Pacquaio has taken any PED's. Simple as that.

[IronDanHamza]

Was that a y or a n

Give Travesty my regards

I think I made that incredibly clear when I said the word "NO".

Still not seeing your point with that question? Is there one?

[Brother Mouzone]

22 pages , PAC still got it ....................Call me crazy but I like PAC in this fight despite his age ..

[Roadblock]

Except there isn't any circumstantial evidence as already established and I have no interest in delving into the realms of absurdity with fictional legal trials in what shoulda coulda and woulda happened.

There is no evidence that Pacquaio has taken any PED's. Simple as that.

Mate open your eyes you haven't established anything other than your opinion, and here you are saying the official legal definitions are wrong wtf is that lol. At least explain to us why the legal people are wrong and you are right?

Whatever when somebody is in denial there is no hope.

[IronDanHamza]

Mate open your eyes you haven't established anything other than your opinion, and here you are saying the official legal definitions are wrong wtf is that lol. At least explain to us why the legal people are wrong and you are right?

Whatever when somebody is in denial there is no hope.

Your whole argument is literally nothing but your opinion

You've asserted it's something that's it's not. Your whole argument orginally was based off two things, one thing we've established Pacquaio didn't even say and the second one being a contradciton except it isn't a contradciton.

Your argument is then based off an imginary trial that we have and will never have ANY IDEA OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN outside of nothing but pure specultation.

You may aswell argue who would win in a fight out of Batman and Superman and then go one further and argue they're on PED's

Point being, you have no argument. And more to the point, there's no evidence that Pacquaio is on PED's, which is what matters here.

[Roadblock]

Your whole argument is literally nothing but your opinion

You've asserted it's something that's it's not. Your whole argument orginally was based off two things, one thing we've established Pacquaio didn't even say and the second one being a contradciton except it isn't a contradciton.

Your argument is then based off an imginary trial that we have and will never have ANY IDEA OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN outside of nothing but pure specultation.

You may aswell argue who would win in a fight out of Batman and Superman and then go one further and argue they're on PED's

Point being, you have no argument. And more to the point, there's no evidence that Pacquaio is on PED's, which is what matters here.

I don't have an argument I have a statement backed up by what is legal definition.

Wtf are you on about address the post you quoted how can you say the legal definition is wrong, show me how it is not circumstantial evidence, Ive given you the official definition so you give me your definition? You say it isn't yet cannot say why.