Comments Thread For: Whyte The 'Victim Of Contaminated Substance', According To Investigation

[IronDanHamza]

Funny how everyone is attacking him when it’s happened bf with a over the counter supplement that had an ingredient years ago for whatever reason being on the banned list but Fury actually took a full fledged steroid intentionally along with Hughie and he gets a pass like he didn’t take any when he fought in the time period of 2014/2015 ? Lol

If you attack someone just remember to include others every time you mention another keep it real if that’s possible on here ?

Dillian Whyte tested positive for Dbol, which is an anabolic steroid. Or as you put it “full fledged steroid”.

Fury tested positive for Deca, which is also an anabolic steroid. But can also flag on a positive test due to contamination.

There’s no difference between these two cases in Fury and Whyte except that Whyte has tested positive for PEDs four times and Fury once.

[juggernaut666]

Dillian Whyte tested positive for Dbol, which is an anabolic steroid. Or as you put it “full fledged steroid”.

Fury tested positive for Deca, which is also an anabolic steroid. But can also flag on a positive test due to contamination.

There’s no difference between these two cases in Fury and Whyte except that Whyte has tested positive for PEDs four times and Fury once.

The difference is Fury tested positive 6 months before he fought Wlad and somehow had the Hammer contest over turned to a win instead no contest . The other difference is Whyte didn’t claim false reports of mental illness and disappear until stature of limitations was up where no case could be he,d again him . Fury tested positive for nandrolone not deca which is a mild steroid . Nandrolone is a powerful steroid.

You also are also ignoring the first time of a banned substance in pre work out powder that was available over the counter as a stimulant that’s not steroids .

[IronDanHamza]

The difference is Fury tested positive 6 months before he fought Wlad and somehow had the Hammer contest over turned to a win instead no contest . The other difference is Whyte didnât claim false reports of mental illness and disappear until stature of limitations was up where no case could be he,d again him . Fury tested positive for nandrolone not deca which is a mild steroid . Nandrolone is a powerful steroid.

You also are also ignoring the first time of a banned substance in pre work out powder that was available over the counter as a stimulant thatâs not steroids .

Nandrolone is Deca mate Deca is the street name for Nandrolone.

For you to refer to Deca as a ‘mild steroid’ is wild, it is of the most potent steroids you can take.

None of the the other stuff is relevant. Both of them tested positive for Steroids, both potent steroids aswell (Dbol and Deca) and both of them can use the excuse of contamination, and both of them have as much evidence of being true as each other; Zero.

[SUBZER0ED]

Good luck trying to get 'lost' money back, it is difficult to trust a previously banned drug cheat on another occasion as you would have thought he would know everything that goes in to his body without any doubt.

Yeah, the only way that I can see him winning a lawsuit, is if he can prove the supplement stated on the bottle that it did not contain the banned substance while in fact, it did. If anyone can prove it, I'm sure it's the "forensic expert" from Texas.

[Roberto Vasquez]

There are obvious differences in the situations though. Testosterone is a naturally occurring hormone, Whyte tested positive for a banned substance. And not for the first time.

Testosterone in a 40 year old?? Testosterone drops with age. C'mon man - we have seen Beterbiev box. We know he is on something. Also he had raised levels of Human Growth Hormone.... which also drops off a *LOT* with age.

So if Beterbiev was found innocent the same way - would you be saying he was guilty?? Seems like one rule for the guy you like and one for the guy you don't...

[IronDanHamza]

Testosterone in a 40 year old?? Testosterone drops with age. C'mon man - we have seen Beterbiev box. We know he is on something. Also he had raised levels of Human Growth Hormone.... which also drops off a *LOT* with age.

So if Beterbiev was found innocent the same way - would you be saying he was guilty?? Seems like one rule for the guy you like and one for the guy you don't...

Beterbeiv doesn’t need to be “found innocent” because he didn’t test positive for anything.

His levels of Test and HGH were higher than usual but also underneath the threshold to fail a drug test.

So the two scenarios are not alike, Dillian Whyte has tested positive for PEDs on four separate occasions, Beterbeiv has never tested positive for PEDs.

[Roberto Vasquez]

Beterbeiv doesn’t need to be “found innocent” because he didn’t test positive for anything.

His levels of Test and HGH were higher than usual but also underneath the threshold to fail a drug test.

So the two scenarios are not alike, Dillian Whyte has tested positive for PEDs on four separate occasions, Beterbeiv has never tested positive for PEDs.

No he didn't test positive for PEDs 4 times but more importantly Dillian Whyte isn't boxing like a 20 year old....

[famicommander]

No he didn't test positive for PEDs 4 times but more importantly Dillian Whyte isn't boxing like a 20 year old....

3 times in boxing, 1 time in kickboxing. Whyte is a 4X offender that we know of.

[IronDanHamza]

No he didn't test positive for PEDs 4 times but more importantly Dillian Whyte isn't boxing like a 20 year old....

Pretty sure he did.

Once in Kickboxing and 3 times in Boxing.

The second parts irrelevant, just means he's not that reactive to the gear and that he must be quite poor naturally if he's still dead average on gear. But that's the vast majority of people who take gear any way. PED's aren't some magic potion that will turn a below average athlete into an elite athlete. You still need genetics, talent, athletic ability etc

[Roberto Vasquez]

Pretty sure he did.

Once in Kickboxing and 3 times in Boxing.

The second parts irrelevant, just means he's not that reactive to the gear and that he must be quite poor naturally if he's still dead average on gear. But that's the vast majority of people who take gear any way. PED's aren't some magic potion that will turn a below average athlete into an elite athlete. You still need genetics, talent, athletic ability etc

That actually impressed me about Lance Armstrong.Winning all those races while on PEDs. When I was on drugs - I couldn't even find my bike.

Whyte had a genuine fail from kickboxing and the other tests were confirmed to be mistakes - either cleared by the B sample or proved to be contaminated substances. Just the same as Beterbiev - rasied levels of various things but in Whyte's case they were above the actual limit. Doesn't mean he tested postive for PEDs. In fact many PEDs are very hard to test for now. e.g. Human growth hormone etc. You can take out of competition.