Originally posted by BodyBagz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Canelo Greater than Chavez ? If he never fights Benavidez
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Teetotaler69 View Post
Jesus christ
Citron: old af
Trout: was a good close win for the ginger
May:got humiliated for 12 rounds and is the main reason your stupidass is blowing carnela so hard
Angulo: is fvkcing trash
Gift against Lara
Kirkland hadn't fought in 2 years and was coming off a loss in 1st round ko lmao
Cotto was old af
Try again dumbass
it's just human nature to look at only the negative aspects for those you want to criticize, and the positive aspects for those you want to laud.
I believe objectively if you compare both men they got gifts, both were beaten badly by technical gifted Fighters, and both men beat tough fighters. You may make a case for either guy. I mean look with JC how he managed to beat Taylor, you can make that somewhat equivalent to any gift decision Canelo got with Triple G. Mayweather handled Canelo easily, sweet pea outclassed JC. I don't see the great disparity here
Comment
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
Ohh!! Shiat. It's getting ugly here in intranet land.
it's just human nature to look at only the negative aspects for those you want to criticize, and the positive aspects for those you want to laud.
I believe objectively if you compare both men they got gifts, both were beaten badly by technical gifted Fighters, and both men beat tough fighters. You may make a case for either guy. I mean look with JC how he managed to beat Taylor, you can make that somewhat equivalent to any gift decision Canelo got with Triple G. Mayweather handled Canelo easily, sweet pea outclassed JC. I don't see the great disparity here
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teetotaler69 View Post
Not really chavez was chasing Whittaker for a while before sweat Pea finally fought. That was due to chavez slowing down same as carnela choosing golovkin when he started to look weak against brook and Jacobs. Your just cheerelading and not looking at things objectively
Comment
-
-
Comment