Originally posted by flyest1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather: "Mosley, a Jealous Former Steroid User"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by edgarg View PostMosley, at 38, and after many tough battles, is only about 50% of his best, if even that much, but it's still too much for Mayweather..
Mayweather is in his prime right now. I've never seen him more fit and in form.
Mosley better be at least 80% for it to even be competitive.
You can tout all these theories about Floyd not being a draw, and nearly killing Corrales to make weight and ect ect, all you want, but the fact remains there is enough skill in his gloves to beat 4 amateurs at the same time. So, take that as you will, oh crusty veteran.
And there have been moments of his career where he wasn't assured of a win ahead of time. To assert that the man has always stacked the deck from day one is a bit much.
Go through his whole catalog and say that... On the contrary, I would contend that he was so miles ahead of some of his opposition, it just made it look unfair. A la Marquez. Face it, if that fight had been competitive, no one would have been crying about weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Syf View PostPshaw.
Mayweather is in his prime right now. I've never seen him more fit and in form.
Mosley better be at least 80% for it to even be competitive.
You can tout all these theories about Floyd not being a draw, and nearly killing Corrales to make weight and ect ect, all you want, but the fact remains there is enough skill in his gloves to beat 4 amateurs at the same time. So, take that as you will, oh crusty veteran.
And there have been moments of his career where he wasn't assured of a win ahead of time. To assert that the man has always stacked the deck from day one is a bit much.
Go through his whole catalog and say that... On the contrary, I would contend that he was so miles ahead of some of his opposition, it just made it look unfair. A la Marquez. Face it, if that fight had been competitive, no one would have been crying about weight.
I think the FACTS about the Corrales fight are deserving of much more than being described as "touted" which term is negative, and derogatory!
Comment
-
Originally posted by edgarg View PostAll I can say is "you are entitled to your opinion".
I think the FACTS about the Corrales fight are deserving of much more than being described as "touted" which term is negative, and derogatory!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Syf View PostPshaw.
Mayweather is in his prime right now. I've never seen him more fit and in form.
Mosley better be at least 80% for it to even be competitive.
You can tout all these theories about Floyd not being a draw, and nearly killing Corrales to make weight and ect ect, all you want, but the fact remains there is enough skill in his gloves to beat 4 amateurs at the same time. So, take that as you will, oh crusty veteran.
And there have been moments of his career where he wasn't assured of a win ahead of time. To assert that the man has always stacked the deck from day one is a bit much.
Go through his whole catalog and say that... On the contrary, I would contend that he was so miles ahead of some of his opposition, it just made it look unfair. A la Marquez. Face it, if that fight had been competitive, no one would have been crying about weight.
When applied to a bottle of wine.......it means old and of very good vintage. I may be this!
Comment
-
Originally posted by edgarg View PostMayweather may be right....but he also may be wrong. It's an undeniable fact that for most of his career he couldn't even half fill a 4,000 seat arena. I'm not sure but I think only a fight or three before the Oscar fight, he was a zero draw.
His strong point was always his mouth, not his boxing expertise, no matter how skilled he is, and he very carefully picked as his opponents only those he felt certain he'd beat.
I recall very well his fight with Diego Corrales, which actually brought him to my attention, as well as to the attention of the boxing public. I saw immediately his reason for fighting Corrales, who, it should be known, was the favourite to beat him. The average fight fan is not aware, but Mayweather very carefully set the stage for this fight. He chose Corrales, nearly 6 ft.tall, who had already left the 130 lb. division, and was walking around at about 150 or more, was in desperate trouble with the Law, was penniless and thirsty for money to pay his legal expenses, had a very bad matrimonial situation, and actually was due to go to jail for 2 years immediately after the fight.
Corrales, being questioned about his weight problems, when asked why he'd take such an unsuitable fight, said that "he made me an offer I couldn't refuse". He spent his training time in just trying to shed the weight, was overweight on the first weigh in, and had spent most of the previous day in a sweat box. As T.K. Stewart wrote, "when I saw Corrales, his skin grey, every rib showing, and looking like death, could hardly stand, I knew right away he had no chance of winning" (paraphrasing).
Later, Larry Merchant was talking about having seen Corrales in his dressing room, just before the fight, stuffing down a huge hamburger.
The point I'm making is that Mayweather will NEVER make a fight with anyone he is not certain, for whatever reason (which of course is not known to the casual fan) of winning and he's pretty good at prognosticating.
Oscar used to do the same thing, but not as well, so he often lost fights he was sure he'd win. So....Mayweather should be a sure thing, if you want to win some betting money.
With all the talk about the $600,000 that he forfeited, it guaranteed him a certian win, even without all the other advantages, and he could have backed himself to win to make that money back. However, compared to his purse and PPV, it was only a "fleabite", in exchange for a 100% guaranteed win. Smart guy.
Originally posted by Al Haymon View PostYes.
In 2006, Floyd and Shane were both WW's. Shane only took the Feroz fights at 154 bc obviously, Fernando can't make 147, and those were the biggest paydays available for SM. But Shane had repeatedly said that he was a WW. SM's two fights before and two fights after Vargas were at WW, thus confirming his words.
The Floyd-Shane fight was on the table. Floyd wanted it. Shane wanted it. HBO was hyping it and had given it a date.
But Shane had a dental appointment.
Originally posted by PETEY GREEN View PostYou mean face to face? as when Shane entered the ring to challenge Floyd? Floyd handled that **** the right way! Told shane to fall back, this is my moment, "i dont jump in the ring after your fights, when it's your time to shine you shine"..that aint backin down, this aint wwf smack down wrestlin..lol..what did you want Floyd to do? Plus ,Floyd has called out Shane on numerous occasions! Oh! And why y'all givin Shane a pass for usin steroids? If Mayweather was caught usin steroids..you Floyd haters would assasinate his characeter 10 FOLD!!!!! Would nt let him live it down in a million years! So on that note. **** Shane, beat Berto first(which he might lose) and getcha buzz up!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SkillspayBills View PostYou like to capitalize the word "FACT" but all your arguments are based on OPINIONS. Go figure...
And, after all, one just had to look at the fight itself. And I'm not ******. No one had EVER seen Corrales so slow and fumbling. I recall him starting several very slow punches and stopping them in mid air because they were out of place. He was very slow all round. And it wasn't because Mayweather, good as he is, was too fast. In those days Corrales himself was not slow, was unbeaten and was regarded as a killer. His problem was that he'd grown out of the weight and, if he was to be carrying the muscles he needed, he had to go up to the next weight class.
The way he went down from "love-taps" was a true "give-away' as to his conditionHe wasn't hurt at any time. He more or less "folded" in sections, sort of slow-motion. He was almost delirious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by edgargI think the FACTS about the Corrales fight are deserving of much more than being described as "touted" which term is negative, and derogatory!Originally posted by edgarg View PostI always thought that the adjective "crusty" referred to bad tempered when applied to a person. I am not really "crusty".
When applied to a bottle of wine.......it means old and of very good vintage. I may be this!
You certainly do have a way of immediately recognizing my quasi subtle jibes, don't you..
Well, I do believe you have boxed. Your response style seems to be a testimonial.
Either that, or you were on the debate team in high school. lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by MindBat View PostSo it's Floyd's fault Corrales chose to drain himself? What about all the Dis-advantages Oscar made Floyd agree to in order to have a winning edge?
It's also worth repeating that Floyd called him and others out on live TV when Larry Merchant inquired about it.
Without a doubt. Floyd would've been crucified at the altar for committing such a disgrace in the sport he so loves.
My recollection is that Oscar, who hadn't fought as a welterweight for years, abd then only on Cinquo de Maya (sp?) actually was just before the fight, at 143.5 lbs, and when supposedly re-hydrated, was still well under the welterweight limit. That alone showed that he was in dire straits, and there were many "expert" comments about it. Oscar looked good, but was drained, as weak as a kitten.
And still a case could have been made for him that he should have got the decision, or at least a draw.
However, if you have conclusive evidence that I'm wrong, and you're right, that's O.K. with me. I have "no axe to grind" in this discussion merely enjoying the differing opinions and vehemently defended positions.
Comment
Comment