Comments Thread For: Bob Arum: Jamaine Ortiz Was Running Around The Ring; That Isn't Boxing; This Was Disgraceful

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 55970
    • 10,042
    • 5,023
    • 763,445

    #131
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza

    How can I explain it any clearer that that quote is directly referring to and in response to being asked about Beterbeiv's atypical finding?

    Why are you trying to paint that it's not referring to a 39 year old when this quote from VADA is literally referring to a 39 year old fighter in regards to it being common and not su****ious? They have flat out stated, explicitly, that Beterbiev's atypical finding is common, and not su****ious from their point of view.
    ​​
    Why are you not taking VADA at their word like you are USADA? Like you do when they said it with Mayweather?
    The quote says atypical findings are common in PED testing. Not that it’s common for 39-year-olds to have atypically high levels of HGH and testosterone.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48597
      • 4,823
      • 267
      • 104,043

      #132
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

      The quote says atypical findings are common in PED testing. Not that it’s common for 39-year-olds to have atypically high levels of HGH and testosterone.
      Why are you refusing to adknowledge that VADA have explicitly deemed Beterbiev's atypical finding common and unsu****ious? I don't get it.

      Who is that quote directly referring to in direct response? Is it Artur Beterbiev?

      Or do you think this is just some random quote and in response to a question asked about Betebiev's atypical finding?

      Comment

      • ShoulderRoll
        Join The Great Resist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 55970
        • 10,042
        • 5,023
        • 763,445

        #133
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza

        Why are you refusing to adknowledge that VADA have explicitly deemed Beterbiev's atypical finding common and unsu****ious? I don't get it.

        Who is that quote directly referring to in direct response? Is it Artur Beterbiev?

        Or do you think this is just some random quote and in response to a question asked about Betebiev's atypical finding?
        I’m just telling you what VADA said. Nowhere did they claim it was common for 39-year-olds to have atypically high levels of HGH and testosterone.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48597
          • 4,823
          • 267
          • 104,043

          #134
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

          I’m just telling you what VADA said. Nowhere did they claim it was common for 39-year-olds to have atypically high levels of HGH and testosterone.
          And when VADA said that about this specific atypical finding, that it's common and not su****ious, who were they referring to and how old were they?

          Why are you refusing to acknowledge that VADA have explicitly deemed Beterbiev's atypical finding common and unsu****ious? I don't get it.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 55970
            • 10,042
            • 5,023
            • 763,445

            #135
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza

            And when VADA said that about this specific atypical finding, that it's common and not su****ious, who were they referring to and how old were they?

            Why are you refusing to acknowledge that VADA have explicitly deemed Beterbiev's atypical finding common and unsu****ious? I don't get it.
            They didn’t say it was not su****ious.

            They said it was common…to have atypical findings in PED testing. Nowhere did they say that it was common for 39-year-olds.

            Comment

            • TheIronMike
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2018
              • 4168
              • 1,261
              • 779
              • 17,589

              #136
              Bob is senile. He's just upset because his fighter got exposed for the 3rd time. He can't cut the ring off!

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48597
                • 4,823
                • 267
                • 104,043

                #137
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

                They didn’t say it was not su****ious.
                They said; "no negative inference should be drawn from an atypical finding in and of itself." in regards to Beterbiev's atypical finding I.e that is not suspcious.

                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                They said it was common…to have atypical findings in PED testing. Nowhere did they say that it was common for 39-year-olds.
                And when they said this particular atypical finding was common, who were they referring to and how old were they?

                This is genuinely the most pathetic tap dancing I've ever seen in my life.

                VADA were directly asked about Beterbiev's atypical finding and they said it was common and no negative inference should be drawn from it.

                Why do you refuse to acknowledge that?

                Comment

                • HiTech
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Feb 2024
                  • 75
                  • 29
                  • 135
                  • 0

                  #138
                  Originally posted by Combat Talk Radio
                  "The guy just wouldn't stand in front of us so Teo could hit him. It's disgraceful - brings back memories of what Floyd did to Manny. Why won't these fighters just LET us hit them???"



                  ...oh wait, you mean Ortiz OUTLANDED Teofimo? Whaaaa??? HOW can that happen if all he did was run???
                  Ortiz outlanded Teo with 2 punches overall. Yet Teo outlanded Ortiz by 6 power punches smh make it make sense

                  Comment

                  • Combat Talk Radio
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 21727
                    • 2,781
                    • 6,368
                    • 83,247

                    #139
                    Originally posted by 99problemz

                    Ortiz outlanded Teo with 2 punches overall. Yet Teo outlanded Ortiz by 6 power punches smh make it make sense
                    Ok, so if Teo outlanded Ortiz, then Ortiz couldn’t have been “running”.

                    The bottom line is that NSB discredits the jab. That’s the problem.

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 48597
                      • 4,823
                      • 267
                      • 104,043

                      #140
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

                      They didn’t say it was not su****ious.
                      They said; "no negative inference should be drawn from an atypical finding in and of itself." in regards to Beterbiev's atypical finding I.e that is not suspcious.

                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                      They said it was common…to have atypical findings in PED testing. Nowhere did they say that it was common for 39-year-olds.
                      And when they said this particular atypical finding was common, who were they referring to and how old were they?

                      This is genuinely the most pathetic tap dancing I've ever seen in my life.

                      VADA were directly asked about Beterbiev's atypical finding and they said it was common and no negative inference should be drawn from it.

                      Why do you refuse to acknowledge that?​

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP