The $10mil fine is unenforceable theatre

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dan-b
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 3266
    • 1,910
    • 2,525
    • 6,731

    #1

    The $10mil fine is unenforceable theatre

    11:51 below. Egis Klimas says it will come "...from his next purse or previous purse or whatever is gonna happen...it will come from the fighter's purse."

    What if the non-competing opponent never fights again? Why would it need to be from a "purse" as opposed to existing cash holdings of the fighter? It's just theatre for a dubious public.

  • MulaKO
    Zero F@cks Given
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 26356
    • 6,610
    • 6,027
    • 221,421

    #2
    Can’t see his excellency shaming his name for Tyson fughin Fury
    Nah I don’t believe that and if it were to be truthful , well , there goes the Saudi money and boxing adventure

    Comment

    • Eff Pandas
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 52131
      • 3,624
      • 2,147
      • 1,635,919

      #3
      The Saudis are good at hype so yea if what Egis is saying is correct its just to market the fight cuz mfers won't pay attention to the small print.

      Comment

      • Roadblock
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 14031
        • 3,535
        • 428
        • 108,713

        #4
        I suppose it could be written in a contract that is legally binding and signed by both fighters.

        Comment

        • crimsonfalcon07
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2021
          • 5922
          • 3,515
          • 2,848
          • 1,030

          #5
          ESPN says that it comes out of the purse for the fighter. So it's unenforceable only if the fighter wants to never fight for the Saudis again and miss out on all future Big Oil paydays. So yes, if they're willing to retire and miss out on a massive payday and forfeit all future Big money paydays, sure. And that's leaving aside other ways that the Saudis have to enforce things. Dunno that anyone would be willing to leave that much money on the table though.

          Comment

          • Toffee
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2018
            • 7205
            • 2,490
            • 74
            • 62,824

            #6
            The Courts would reject it in my opinion. It's been presented so far as a penalty clause and I'm assuming a court would see it the same way.

            You can claim for damages. You can have an amount in the contract for damages. But you can't have a penalty clause. Or more to the point, you can have one but it can be challenged in court if someone doesn't want to pay.

            If Fury doesn't make it to this fight, you can bet that Usyk will need to take him to court to see that money.

            Consider as well that the contract probably already has injury and delay clauses. It's a boxing contract. It happens.

            Comment

            • Toffee
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2018
              • 7205
              • 2,490
              • 74
              • 62,824

              #7
              Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07
              ESPN says that it comes out of the purse for the fighter. So it's unenforceable only if the fighter wants to never fight for the Saudis again and miss out on all future Big Oil paydays. So yes, if they're willing to retire and miss out on a massive payday and forfeit all future Big money paydays, sure. And that's leaving aside other ways that the Saudis have to enforce things. Dunno that anyone would be willing to leave that much money on the table though.
              Yes, the Saudis could simply refuse to work with anyone who doesn't pay.

              Mind you, they might just be ready to retire anyway.

              Comment

              • Lance98
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2018
                • 2892
                • 872
                • 3
                • 22,215

                #8
                The government (kingdom) is directly involved and if fury disobeys and shames them, there will be repercussions. I am not worried about usyk pulling out.

                Comment

                • MulaKO
                  Zero F@cks Given
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 26356
                  • 6,610
                  • 6,027
                  • 221,421

                  #9
                  Heard another stipulation is he’s gonna have to eat balls
                  No , not boars balls but his own

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52131
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Lance98
                    The government (kingdom) is directly involved and if fury disobeys and shames them, there will be repercussions. I am not worried about usyk pulling out.
                    Its not about pulling out. I got 99.9999% confidence neither guy will pull out outside of something that makes them unfit to fight, like Fury's cut rn.

                    There is too much money in play & both these mfers are old & don't have many paydays like this left if this isn't the last insane payday to whoever loses.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP