Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua-Wilder is Dead For Now, It's a Mismatch in My Opinion!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by pollywog View Post

    And to think, AJ with all those levels still doesn't back himself to beat the corpse of Wilder even now.
    If AJ fought Wilder next and beat him you would say Wilder was shot and Parker ruined him

    If he doesn't fight him next you will say he's ducking.

    Just put in your sig "I Haye Anthony joshua and will never give him credit for anything" and save us and yourself the next 2000 of your posts.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by pollywog View Post

      And to think, AJ with all those levels still doesn't back himself to beat the corpse of Wilder even now.
      He signed the fight, so that’s clearly not true.

      But the Saudis won’t pay the big bucks to see AJ destroy Wilder.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Atypicalbrit View Post

        If AJ fought Wilder next and beat him you would say Wilder was shot and Parker ruined him

        If he doesn't fight him next you will say he's ducking.

        Just put in your sig "I Haye Anthony joshua and will never give him credit for anything" and save us and yourself the next 2000 of your posts.
        I get it!

        You need to make Wilder's career seem like dogsh.it so that Parker's win seems less impressive...

        ...And to elevate AJ's sparring partner to world beater so he looks like God's gift to boxing.

        So if AJ fought Wilder next and got laid out what would i say then ?

        ...cos there is every possibility that could happen. AJ knows it, Fast Eddie knows it. It's best not to tempt fate and find out though, dont you think ?

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by pollywog View Post

          I get it!

          You need to make Wilder's career seem like dogsh.it so that Parker's win seems less impressive...

          ...And to elevate AJ's sparring partner to world beater so he looks like God's gift to boxing.

          So if AJ fought Wilder next and got laid out what would i say then ?

          ...cos there is every possibility that could happen. AJ knows it, Fast Eddie knows it. It's best not to tempt fate and find out though, dont you think ?
          We could have found out if Wilder was able to beat Joseph Parker.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by spyker92 View Post

            We could have found out if Wilder was able to beat Joseph Parker.
            It doesn't work like that.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by spyker92 View Post

              Usyk beat AJ twice because he’s better than AJ.

              Parker whitewashed Wilder because he’s better than Wilder.

              Honestly, you Americans should stop clinging onto Wilder. Ruiz is the true American HW hope. Wilder is just a HW Rolly Romero. He hasn’t beaten anybody of note, or developed an ounce of skill “TO THIS DAY!!”
              You Brits need to stop clinging onto AJ. Fury has been the only legit UK heavyweight. Aj is just a heavyweight Chavez jr. A mentally weak quitter. See you Brits keep bringing it to Wilder, who I’m not defending. I’m literally saying he’s overrated with limited skill. But you all get defensive over AJ and pretend he’s on some different level when he’s not. His resume sucks too, biggest win is a washed up 40 yr old coming off a loss and year and half of inactivity. Otherwise, he’s another one of those Brits who has had domestic level success but truly isn’t an elite boxer. He and wilder are in the same plain of mediocrity whether you like it or not. You should be used it by now as mediocrity describes British boxing quite accurately for a while now.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by pollywog View Post

                It doesn't work like that.
                It really does.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  You Brits need to stop clinging onto AJ. Fury has been the only legit UK heavyweight. Aj is just a heavyweight Chavez jr. A mentally weak quitter. See you Brits keep bringing it to Wilder, who I’m not defending. I’m literally saying he’s overrated with limited skill. But you all get defensive over AJ and pretend he’s on some different level when he’s not. His resume sucks too, biggest win is a washed up 40 yr old coming off a loss and year and half of inactivity. Otherwise, he’s another one of those Brits who has had domestic level success but truly isn’t an elite boxer. He and wilder are in the same plain of mediocrity whether you like it or not. You should be used it by now as mediocrity describes British boxing quite accurately for a while now.
                  You are right. We are spoilt for choice in the UK. We have multiple top tier heavyweights.

                  Fury is legit, as you say. His best win is Klitschko, so by your own admission that makes AJ legit.

                  Glad we could agree.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by spyker92 View Post

                    You are right. We are spoilt for choice in the UK. We have multiple top tier heavyweights.

                    Fury is legit, as you say. His best win is Klitschko, so by your own admission that makes AJ legit.

                    Glad we could agree.
                    Nice try but fury beat Klitchko when he was champ and hadn’t lost a fight in about 7 yrs. AJ beat him after he came off a loss and a year and a half of inactivity, and had to go through hell to do so. Outside of Fury, Uk boxing is extremely mediocre.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                      What physical advantages did Usyk have? He was shorter, lighter and less of a reach. His advantage was that he was better and not mentally fragile. Despite your constant denial, even with proof provided.

                      Holmes was definitely past his prime vs Spinks. Everyone knows that.
                      I never said he was the only one to lose to a smaller man
                      , I’m just pointing out that he did and the manner in which he did along with other fights proves my original point in that hearns overrated him. He actually considered him a top 10 he ever on his ridiculous list. So if you agree that Hearn overrates him, not sure what you’re debating other than being in denial about his weak mind.
                      Hand speed. Foot speed. Co-ordination. Stamina.

                      There are physical advantages that come with being 6' 6" and 250lb of ripped muscle and there are physical disadvantages, when compared to a smaller man.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP