Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Says Joshua-Wilder Winner Would Emerge As Mandatory For Title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    They be pretty ****** to pay a sanction fee to him

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by TreD View Post
      So, if Wallin and Parker win, does the winner of that fight get the same treatment? Or will it be a semi-final eliminator? Lol
      I doubt anyone gaf about Wallin vs Parker, but I'm sure Wallin gets in line for a belt. Although with the rematch clause he gots with AJ & Fury & Usyk having a 2way one he won't be fighting the Fury vs Usyk winner anytime soon.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Teetotaler69 View Post
        Clowns


        Didn't they say windmill-ruiz was mandatory? Lol
        Never enforced, so it was never real. In my opinion it suited the WBC not to enforce a mandatory on Fury as they know he would simply drop the belt. The Wilder v Ruiz 'order' was just a deliberate public farce.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
          In theory that could end up making AJ vs Deontay for a vacant belt as Fury vs Usyk have a 2way rematch clause so the winner won't be able to fight the AJ vs Wallin winner.
          Wrong. The only belt that'd be vacant is the IBF and Wilder's not ranked with them. What relevance does AJ/Wallin have to Usyk/Fury? Lol

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by boxing IQ View Post

            Wrong. The only belt that'd be vacant is the IBF and Wilder's not ranked with them. What relevance does AJ/Wallin have to Usyk/Fury? Lol
            ... Parker is bud. AJ-Wilder doesn't happen if Wilder doesn't beat him. IBF would be hard pressed to find a reason why the guy who just beat one of their top 5 shouldn't be rated.


            Rematches.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by HawkHogan View Post

              ... Parker is bud. AJ-Wilder doesn't happen if Wilder doesn't beat him. IBF would be hard pressed to find a reason why the guy who just beat one of their top 5 shouldn't be rated.


              Rematches.
              They're not going to rank him above Hrgovic for beating Parker.

              Only way Wilder v Joshua will be for a belt is if the WBC strip Fury or if Fury drops the belt.

              Usyk and Fury aren't in the ring yet. No guarantees with Fury.
              Last edited by Toffee; 12-22-2023, 08:02 AM.
              boxing IQ boxing IQ likes this.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Toffee View Post

                They're not going to rank him above Hrgovic for beating Parker.

                Only way Wilder v Joshua will be for a belt is if the WBC strip Fury or if Fury drops the belt.

                Usyk and Fury aren't in the ring yet. No guarantees with Fury.
                I got two things to say to you

                1.) You are a top quality poster I do not think I've seen another poster brag on outside of hey I agree. So, here's your brag bud, if no one else ever said it; you are a top poster. Quality.

                2.) I totally did forget Fil is already the mando, Panda may have been implying something else.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by HawkHogan View Post

                  ... Parker is bud. AJ-Wilder doesn't happen if Wilder doesn't beat him. IBF would be hard pressed to find a reason why the guy who just beat one of their top 5 shouldn't be rated.


                  Rematches.
                  They would only rank him if he paid their sanctioning fees, which he doesn't as of right now.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post

                    From all accounts the Fury vs Usyk money is ****** good. Neither of those two are gonna opt out of the rematch.
                    Fury AJ is a bigger fight (commercially as in way more people will watch it as will attract a lot more of a casual audience than Fury Usyk 2), the money will be even more ******.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Boxing 112 View Post

                      Fury AJ is a bigger fight (commercially as in way more people will watch it as will attract a lot more of a casual audience than Fury Usyk 2), the money will be even more ******.
                      I'm positive Fury will go after it after he makes $200M or w/e he's making from these Usyk fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP