They be pretty ****** to pay a sanction fee to him
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Says Joshua-Wilder Winner Would Emerge As Mandatory For Title
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TreD View PostSo, if Wallin and Parker win, does the winner of that fight get the same treatment? Or will it be a semi-final eliminator? Lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teetotaler69 View PostClowns
Didn't they say windmill-ruiz was mandatory? Lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostIn theory that could end up making AJ vs Deontay for a vacant belt as Fury vs Usyk have a 2way rematch clause so the winner won't be able to fight the AJ vs Wallin winner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxing IQ View Post
Wrong. The only belt that'd be vacant is the IBF and Wilder's not ranked with them. What relevance does AJ/Wallin have to Usyk/Fury? Lol
Rematches.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HawkHogan View Post
... Parker is bud. AJ-Wilder doesn't happen if Wilder doesn't beat him. IBF would be hard pressed to find a reason why the guy who just beat one of their top 5 shouldn't be rated.
Rematches.
Only way Wilder v Joshua will be for a belt is if the WBC strip Fury or if Fury drops the belt.
Usyk and Fury aren't in the ring yet. No guarantees with Fury.Last edited by Toffee; 12-22-2023, 08:02 AM.boxing IQ likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toffee View Post
They're not going to rank him above Hrgovic for beating Parker.
Only way Wilder v Joshua will be for a belt is if the WBC strip Fury or if Fury drops the belt.
Usyk and Fury aren't in the ring yet. No guarantees with Fury.
1.) You are a top quality poster I do not think I've seen another poster brag on outside of hey I agree. So, here's your brag bud, if no one else ever said it; you are a top poster. Quality.
2.) I totally did forget Fil is already the mando, Panda may have been implying something else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HawkHogan View Post
... Parker is bud. AJ-Wilder doesn't happen if Wilder doesn't beat him. IBF would be hard pressed to find a reason why the guy who just beat one of their top 5 shouldn't be rated.
Rematches.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
From all accounts the Fury vs Usyk money is ****** good. Neither of those two are gonna opt out of the rematch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing 112 View Post
Fury AJ is a bigger fight (commercially as in way more people will watch it as will attract a lot more of a casual audience than Fury Usyk 2), the money will be even more ******.
Comment
Comment