Mauricio Sulaiman, WBC: No Rush To Strip Canelo, Let's Let The Process Play Out

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • just the facts
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 13768
    • 2,432
    • 1,021
    • 88,113

    #21
    Originally posted by QballLobo

    You mean the rematch Canelo’s team offered him in June for September and Bivol turned down?
    Yeah, the insult of an offer so Canelo could could save face and duck Bivol. They knew Bivol wasn’t going to accept that garbage offer.

    Comment

    • james240
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2017
      • 1164
      • 191
      • 0
      • 19,005

      #22
      Originally posted by just the facts

      Yeah, the insult of an offer so Canelo could could save face and duck Bivol. They knew Bivol wasn’t going to accept that garbage offer.
      Rematch with the same terms it was said Bivol refused and wanted more money.

      Nobody knows who Bivol is or cares should of taken the fight again and back his skill to beat him again.

      Suicide career move.

      Comment

      • JakeTheBoxer
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2014
        • 20936
        • 4,571
        • 2,780
        • 123,960

        #23
        No rush to strip Canelo, we need the money from his fights.

        Comment

        • Shadoww702
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2015
          • 41176
          • 4,546
          • 2,938
          • 250,035

          #24
          Originally posted by garfios
          That's bs, if he is not fighting the best he doesn't respect his fans nor himself. You can choose who you fight and keep fighting bums and old men, but you're not the best because you're not beating the best, he didn't build his name, his promoters and matchmakers did it for him with a pile of boxers way past their prime and old men's. Tell me who he has beat in their prime without handicapping them and no controversy? Look at you, you choose to follow a fake boxer and on top of that you support and condone those decisions of fighting 2nd and third tier boxers.
          Bivol? So what if he lost. U is what is WRONG with boxing fans. After Benavidez like ALWAYS u will jump on the nutz of a NEW boogeyman

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #25
            Originally posted by james240

            Rematch with the same terms it was said Bivol refused and wanted more money.

            Nobody knows who Bivol is or cares should of taken the fight again and back his skill to beat him again.

            Suicide career move.
            That dude is a CLOWN

            Comment

            • Combat Talk Radio
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2015
              • 21727
              • 2,781
              • 6,368
              • 83,247

              #26
              Originally posted by fifth_root
              I no longer care about titles, but boxers facing solid opponents. That is what will matter in history, not titles. So WBC sucks in principles differently (or maybe not) than the other sanctioning bodies.
              The history books care about belts. Which is why the boxing media made such a big deal about Crawford fully unifying 147, because that hadn’t been done in the four belt era.

              but history also cares about the journey. And it will show that Errol Spence battled three champions in wars to take their belts while Crawford swept in after the battles. Smart, but that’s what really happened.

              Comment

              • N/A
                BANNED
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2023
                • 1075
                • 364
                • 711
                • 0

                #27
                Originally posted by Leicesterage

                The history books care about belts. Which is why the boxing media made such a big deal about Crawford fully unifying 147, because that hadn’t been done in the four belt era.

                but history also cares about the journey. And it will show that Errol Spence battled three champions in wars to take their belts while Crawford swept in after the battles. Smart, but that’s what really happened.
                Even if so, belts are less valid to define success, because winning or defending one doesn't necessarily mean you faced a good opponent. So history analyses all of that.

                Comment

                • Combat Talk Radio
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 21727
                  • 2,781
                  • 6,368
                  • 83,247

                  #28
                  Originally posted by fifth_root

                  Even if so, belts are less valid to define success, because winning or defending one doesn't necessarily mean you faced a good opponent. So history analyses all of that.
                  Fans do - history doesn't.

                  Remember, Tim Bradley is in the HOF. http://www.ibhof.com/pages/about/ind...n/bradley.html

                  Him being there basically makes the case that Sven Ottke should be there.

                  Comment

                  • garfios
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 7140
                    • 1,521
                    • 3,020
                    • 29,740

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Shadoww702

                    Bivol? So what if he lost. U is what is WRONG with boxing fans. After Benavidez like ALWAYS u will jump on the nutz of a NEW boogeyman
                    Did he beat bivol? I think plant win was a decent one and the guy is in his prime, other than that find me another one without any handicap or ridiculous clause, he put a few on bivol's contract, and we know the only reason he fought is that he looked like $h1t in his previous two fight

                    Comment

                    • garfios
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 7140
                      • 1,521
                      • 3,020
                      • 29,740

                      #30
                      Originally posted by james240

                      Rematch with the same terms it was said Bivol refused and wanted more money.

                      Nobody knows who Bivol is or cares should of taken the fight again and back his skill to beat him again.

                      Suicide career move.
                      Why accept the short end of the stick again, when he was the winner without any controversy, well the cards didn't match what really happen in the ring, is he a dog to run and take the bone from his master?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP