Originally posted by QballLobo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mauricio Sulaiman, WBC: No Rush To Strip Canelo, Let's Let The Process Play Out
Collapse
-
Originally posted by just the facts View Post
Yeah, the insult of an offer so Canelo could could save face and duck Bivol. They knew Bivol wasn’t going to accept that garbage offer.
Nobody knows who Bivol is or cares should of taken the fight again and back his skill to beat him again.
Suicide career move.
Comment
-
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by garfios View PostThat's bs, if he is not fighting the best he doesn't respect his fans nor himself. You can choose who you fight and keep fighting bums and old men, but you're not the best because you're not beating the best, he didn't build his name, his promoters and matchmakers did it for him with a pile of boxers way past their prime and old men's. Tell me who he has beat in their prime without handicapping them and no controversy? Look at you, you choose to follow a fake boxer and on top of that you support and condone those decisions of fighting 2nd and third tier boxers.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by fifth_root View PostI no longer care about titles, but boxers facing solid opponents. That is what will matter in history, not titles. So WBC sucks in principles differently (or maybe not) than the other sanctioning bodies.
but history also cares about the journey. And it will show that Errol Spence battled three champions in wars to take their belts while Crawford swept in after the battles. Smart, but that’s what really happened.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
The history books care about belts. Which is why the boxing media made such a big deal about Crawford fully unifying 147, because that hadn’t been done in the four belt era.
but history also cares about the journey. And it will show that Errol Spence battled three champions in wars to take their belts while Crawford swept in after the battles. Smart, but that’s what really happened.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fifth_root View Post
Even if so, belts are less valid to define success, because winning or defending one doesn't necessarily mean you faced a good opponent. So history analyses all of that.
Remember, Tim Bradley is in the HOF. http://www.ibhof.com/pages/about/ind...n/bradley.html
Him being there basically makes the case that Sven Ottke should be there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
Bivol? So what if he lost. U is what is WRONG with boxing fans. After Benavidez like ALWAYS u will jump on the nutz of a NEW boogeyman
Comment
-
Originally posted by james240 View Post
Rematch with the same terms it was said Bivol refused and wanted more money.
Nobody knows who Bivol is or cares should of taken the fight again and back his skill to beat him again.
Suicide career move.
Comment
Comment