In a recent exchange I had on here another user couldn't get it through his head why I was insisting the fight should go ahead on 23rd December. He thinks insisting on that date, after the Ngannou outcome, made the fight less likely. I think the opposite. By allowing Fury to move on this date there's a good chance the fight won't end up happening at all.
There's a rematch clause after all, so the loser could have made their excuses between the 23rd and the return bout. The Saudis should have told them to get on with it or the deal is off.
I'm not sure how many Fury die hards are left, but whether you're willing to express it openly or not, you must have some doubts too. It must be exhausting being invested in this guy. Inactivity, "retirements" and postponements. It's tedious, and I'm looking forward to boxing being able to move on from this embarrassing episode.
It's within living memory for all of us when we had active champions and boxing wasn't just a grift for assorted cretins (Fury's father being among them). We can get back to that.
There's a rematch clause after all, so the loser could have made their excuses between the 23rd and the return bout. The Saudis should have told them to get on with it or the deal is off.
I'm not sure how many Fury die hards are left, but whether you're willing to express it openly or not, you must have some doubts too. It must be exhausting being invested in this guy. Inactivity, "retirements" and postponements. It's tedious, and I'm looking forward to boxing being able to move on from this embarrassing episode.
It's within living memory for all of us when we had active champions and boxing wasn't just a grift for assorted cretins (Fury's father being among them). We can get back to that.
Comment