Are my numbers right??? (mosley/cotto final punchstats)

[Pullcounter]

It has everything to do with it. I shouldn't have to explain any more.

Cotto wasn't hurt. That was all HBO getting caught up in the moment. Cotto decided to box for reasons I don't know. He just decided to do it in the 9th round. It wasn't a single punch or anything. All I know is he won the rounds he "ran" in. Only lost the 10th because of two good punches. The ones that "hurt" Cotto according to everyone.

c'mon man... just look at the punch stats... => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...6&postcount=79

there's no way cotto won this fight....

[Pullcounter]

You're numbers are right.

thanks... finallly someone checked them...

That doesn't mean Mosley beat Cotto.

sure it does and even if it doesn't it definitely supports it

Mosley said he lost and admitted. Fighters never admit that they lose and Mosley was honest and said he didn't do enough.

gimme a link where the words "i lost" actually come out of his mouth.

please prove me wrong.

Cotto won, plain and simple.

cotto didn't win. mosley got robbed.

It was from 2007.

true, we can't go back and change the robbery, but atleast we can acknowledge that it was a robbery. and even if you lie to yourself and don't acknowledge the robbery, you should atleast have the decency to say that mosley deserved the rematch all along.

[-Antonio-]

c'mon man... just look at the punch stats... => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...6&postcount=79

there's no way cotto won this fight....

Punch stats mean **** and you know it. Shane did fight well, Miguel was just the better man...slightly. Unlike the Clottey fight where at the end I felt like Cotto was the beaten man (although the cut was a factor).

Even if you go round by round, punch stats are also objective, and like I said before Shanes jab is only a measuring stick. It inflicts no damage on his opponent. Cotto's jab cause damage, enhances swelling, catches the judges eye.

[Mr. Philadel]

take from http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...e_mosley_final

seriously, I think mosley won the fight and it wasn't as close as I thought...

anyone see if I messed up on any of the calculations?

......you the man my dude!!!

[Pullcounter]

Punch stats mean **** and you know it.

punch stats are much more objective and unbiased than the any cotto stan's score..

Shane did fight well, Miguel was just the better man...slightly.

Shane didn't just fight well, he won the fight

Unlike the Clottey fight where at the end I felt like Cotto was the beaten man (although the cut was a factor).

cotto beat clottey.... the reason why you felt like cotto lost was because of the cut and because of the margo aftermath.

Even if you go round by round, punch stats are also objective,

better objective than subjective

and like I said before Shanes jab is only a measuring stick. It inflicts no damage on his opponent. Cotto's jab cause damage, enhances swelling, catches the judges eye.

yes, cotto's jab is better than mosley's, but mosley landed more power punches and power punches > jabs.