Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you think ggg can make a comeback

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by dan-b View Post

    Fans like knockouts. His career is akin to Calzaghe's, except Calzaghe won his two "big name" fights, although I would say Canelo was probably a more difficult proposition at that point in his career.
    KO's are awesome

    Still, a ggguy like GGG can KO a ton of ?'s and ggget standing ovations and copious amount of accolades.

    Nelo gets lambasted for KO'ing guys like Kov and Fielding.

    How do those fake fight fans make the distinction between quality KO opponents

    Those same fake fight fans yell at Nelo for fighting ''an old man''.
    As if Nelo planned this out in the womb

    Comment


    • #22
      nope!! GGG was already old when he was consider "good"... and that was like 5 years ago! LOL!!!

      Comment


      • #23
        no chance, hes old toast now

        Comment


        • #24
          GGG is 40+ years old rich man, he has nothing to prove.

          Comment


          • #25
            I hope he gets some last big money soft touch and rides off into retirement. Big Drama Show has done enough for boxing. Donaire's career would have been better without being outclassed by a basic fighter in Santiago, and Pacquiao didn't need to have Ugas elevated and overhyped so much.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

              KO's are awesome

              Still, a ggguy like GGG can KO a ton of ?'s and ggget standing ovations and copious amount of accolades.

              Nelo gets lambasted for KO'ing guys like Kov and Fielding.

              How do those fake fight fans make the distinction between quality KO opponents

              Those same fake fight fans yell at Nelo for fighting ''an old man''.
              As if Nelo planned this out in the womb
              I think the antipathy towards Canelo is mostly an internet thing. Like with most subjects, including politics, the most outspokenly motivated people make themselves known online which can give one a distorted view of things.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by dan-b View Post

                I think the antipathy towards Canelo is mostly an internet thing. Like with most subjects, including politics, the most outspokenly motivated people make themselves known online which can give one a distorted view of things.
                That and, like boxing's scoring "system", a terrible resume is subjective

                Anyone hailing GGG's MW run has to be strange in the head.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by dan-b View Post

                  Reviewing his record on boxrec, he picked up titles in a rather unsatisfactory way didn't he? Both his WBA and WBC reigns began as 'interim'. It was hardly Hopkins snatching them off the real beltholders was it?
                  Blame guys for literally ditching their belts instead of fighting him. And let's not pretend Hopkins MW run was pretty **** for the most part. Can you imagine how much guys would've lost their mind if Golovkin had rematched guys he had already defeated? Posters here would absolutely lose their ****.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by AKAcronym View Post
                    Posters here would absolutely lose their ****.
                    They would but it would be that outspokenly motivated minority I mentioned in another post above. Anger from forum edgelords is not a gauge of anything.

                    As I like discussing Hopkins' career though, let's talk about his middleweight rematches. The first Robert Allen fight ended in a NC so it was right there was an immediate rematch. The third fight was an IBF mandatory and the precursor to the De La Hoya fight.

                    The Echols rematch was also a mandatory: https://lasvegassun.com/news/2000/se...-dec-1-at-rio/

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by dan-b View Post

                      They would but it would be that outspokenly motivated minority I mentioned in another post above. Anger from forum edgelords is not a gauge of anything.

                      As I like discussing Hopkins' career though, let's talk about his middleweight rematches. The first Robert Allen fight ended in a NC so it was right there was an immediate rematch. The third fight was an IBF mandatory and the precursor to the De La Hoya fight.

                      The Echols rematch was also a mandatory: https://lasvegassun.com/news/2000/se...-dec-1-at-rio/
                      Shows how shallow the division was at the time. Wonder how his reign would've been looked at if it was more recent.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP