Comments Thread For: Crawford Reacts To Canelo's Criticism About Lackluster Resume: 'Y'all so Delusional It's Crazy'

[joseph5620]

Based on what? Level of competition Crawford faced at 140 was pretty much equal to Canelo’s at 168 and Crawford dominating Spence to become undisputed at 147 is better than any win canelo has had his entire career.

Facts. Point blank. Period.

[TheWinners]

4 paragraphs? Condense your thoughts you emotional weirdo.

I'm sure that's easy for you to do. Since any useful part of your brain is the size of a pea.

Can't get any dumber. Blaming lack of entitlement and promotional issues as the reason a 36 year old fighter has 1 career defining fight. That's some weird ****. You can't even mask that.

[TheWinners]

Man, you aré a crazy person that does not know anything about boxing.

Canelo resume AND wins aré 10 times.better than Crawford.

And thats a fact, all your comments aré about canelo, your hate Is unreal.

You can cry all you want in this site ,But canelo resume and career Is 3 times.bettee than Terrence

That's all you see is crying. If Crawford is dumb enough to fight Canelo at 168, Canelo won't get credit. Although he's the proclaimed superior boxer.

Took til he was almost 36 to prove he was the best at 147. And it's not like he took the hard road. He took the Devin Haney road. Let some other guy do all the dirty work then get the belts.

[Jab jab boom]

I'm sure that's easy for you to do. Since any useful part of your brain is the size of a pea.

Can't get any dumber. Blaming lack of entitlement and promotional issues as the reason a 36 year old fighter has 1 career defining fight. That's some weird ****. You can't even mask that.

If you don’t believe that Canelo received significantly more entitlement and opportunities than Crawford (or any other current boxer for that matter) you’re more of a ret@rd than I already believe you to be.

[TheWinners]

If you don’t believe that Canelo received significantly more entitlement and opportunities than Crawford (or any other current boxer for that matter) you’re more of a ret@rd than I already believe you to be.

No you're the only one I've ever heard say that. I've heard people talk **** about his resume but never heard he's been entitled in reference to the fights he had.

I've heard the same goofies on these boards claim he was ducking some fighter then he fights and beats them and its " oh he paid the judges ". Been on here awhile. New goofies pop up all the time.

[Jab jab boom]

No you're the only one I've ever heard say that. I've heard people talk **** about his resume but never heard he's been entitled in reference to the fights he had.

I've heard the same goofies on these boards claim he was ducking some fighter then he fights and beats them and it’s " oh he paid the judges ". Been on here awhile. New goofies pop up all the time.

check my post in this thread as to why I feel he’s entitled and tell me I’m wrong.

[boxingitis]

Sir, he fought Amir Khan for the middleweight title of the world lmaoooo. That guy couldn’t even taken a punch at lightweight. Not to mention canelo has implemented more catchweights and rehydration clauses than anyone in boxing history. Plus he’s also been caught taking illegal substances. Please spare me the bullshyt as canelo has consistently compromised his opponents to his benefit. You canelo fans are beyond ridiculous and delusional. Spence after the accident beat the shyt out of Danny Garcia & Ugas. Both better and more credible than Canelo’s entire 168 pound run.

Ugas the 40 years old who beat the other 40 year old pacmans who has been in multiple wars over the years is consider great. Crawford has beaten absolutely no one. His best win is still Postol.

No to mention the Amir Khan was already manhandle by Prescot, Garcia, and Canelo. Then Crawford TKO Khan to the balls.

[Jab jab boom]

Ugas the 40 years old who beat the other 40 year old pacmans who has been in multiple wars over the years is consider great. Crawford has beaten absolutely no one. His best win is still Postol.

No to mention the Amir Khan was already manhandle by Prescot, Garcia, and Canelo. Then Crawford TKO Khan to the balls.

Yet Ugas was still more credible than the shyt list canelo faced at 168. Who did those guys beat? Give me one meaningful win that’s better than even a 40 yr old pac? Yeah Amir khan was a joke for both Crawford and canelo. Difference is, canelo fought him as a mw. You can’t go and give Canelo credit for that fight but then wanna criticize it for Crawford. That’s clown shyt.

[MONGOOSE66]

Terence Crawford could only laugh in disbelief when he got wind of the latest barb from Canelo Alvarez. The undisputed 147-pound champion from Omaha, Nebraska, has been soaking in the adulation after his career-defining beatdown of Errol Spence Jr. last month to unify all four titles in the welterweight division.
[Click Here To Read More]

At the beginning of Crawford’s career. I thought he was the sheeit. He’s a good fighter. Problem I had with him was he COULD have fought a GREAT fighter, in his PEAK, in Mikey Garcia. He didn’t. That would have propelled him to being a great fighter.
Unfortunately for Crawford all the very good fighters are OLD now. Theirs no great fighters to compare him to. He has only Spence to say that he was great against and that isn’t sitting to well with me. Spence truly is a GREAT fighter but upon seeing him at the weigh in and the day off. Spence never “plumped up” like he normally does. I think the rematch SHOULD be at 154. If Crawford takes the fight at 154 that will tell me Crawford is interested in being great but if he doesn’t??????

[MONGOOSE66]

Right now the welterweight division is about as deep as a puddle in the street. It’s not Crawford’s fault. He got rich and that’s all he is concerned with and that’s fine.
Some people aren’t concerned with being Ali, sugar Ray, DelaHoya, Hearns, Hagler, Pacquiao, Mayweather GREATS.