Comments Thread For: Crawford Reacts To Canelo's Criticism About Lackluster Resume: 'Y'all so Delusional It's Crazy'

[TheWinners]

You must be on some canelo nut slobbing thing. I never said Crawford took more risks. I see reading isn’t a strong suit of yours. I clearly stated that Canelo has had more entitlement which means he’s able to get fights that others (like Crawford) weren’t able to get as easily. Austin the gate keeper trout? Lmaooo. I think it’s pretty clear what type of fighter trout was. What separates him from the undefeated Victor postol that Crawford beat? You think trout was more of a challenge than Porter? Trout had 1 significant win vs a lackluster Cotto and has been a stepping stone ever since. Calm your tetas cheerleader.

Entitlement? He fought fighters he had nothing to gain money wise from like Lara who was one of the most ducked fighters. Sounds like a ***** boy excuse from a nut hugger.

Read what the previous poster wrote. Crawfords poor career resume is due to his own decision making. He had every opportunity to seek other promotional ventures and resigned with Top Rank and backed his decision to do so.

He made lots of money through Bob Arum fighting less than stellar comp and he loved it. Then of course like a little worm turned and sued his promoter. Bravo. Fooling bias fan girls such as yourself. You take the cake though. I've heard many say Canelos opposition was trash but never heard his career was " entitled ".

I'm not even going to go back and forth with you about Trout vs Postol. I'm sure that's the best undefeated fighter he beat other than Spence. So I rest my case there.

[ramses07]

GGG looked bad against Jacobs and Deryvchenko, and horrible against a guy that was so mid, I forgot his name.

bro youre comparing those performances vs Spence's performance? lol

he dropped both of the first guys and stopped the other guy

[TheWinners]

this is laughable. Trout has proven to be nothing but a journeyman in his career and canelo eeked by him. Cotto was 35 with 2 ko losses (beaten by plaster and a non drug tested prime pac) and looked to be 2 weight classes smaller in the ring and again, it was a competitive fight. Lara was a good win but canelo really didn’t even deserve to win that fight. Spence was a top 5 p4p fighter who was undefeated and got utterly destroyed by Crawford. Canelo has never dominated an elite fighter. I would say nice try but that would be giving you too much credit as your reply was ridiculous.

You're nit-picking what you can but have no relevant point. It's not debatable but you think it is.

Canelo went and fought the best guy in his division that was destroying everyone 2 times before he cleaned out 168. Then fought him again. It took Crawford his whole career to fight Spence. A couple car crashes and eye surgeries later. And you're blaming it on " entitlement ". What a clown show

Let it go. Crawford's opponents compared to Canelo are ****ty. Youre embarrassing yourself here. I heard a lot on these boards but comparing Crawford and Canelos resume by far the Dumbest **** ever.

[madsweeney]

I think criticism is pretty valid...on activity level. Shame hes only had 40 fights in a 15 year career.

[Jab jab boom]

Entitlement? He fought fighters he had nothing to gain money wise from like Lara who was one of the most ducked fighters. Sounds like a ***** boy excuse from a nut hugger.

Read what the previous poster wrote. Crawfords poor career resume is due to his own decision making. He had every opportunity to seek other promotional ventures and resigned with Top Rank and backed his decision to do so.

He made lots of money through Bob Arum fighting less than stellar comp and he loved it. Then of course like a little worm turned and sued his promoter. Bravo. Fooling bias fan girls such as yourself. You take the cake though. I've heard many say Canelos opposition was trash but never heard his career was " entitled ".

I'm not even going to go back and forth with you about Trout vs Postol. I'm sure that's the best undefeated fighter he beat other than Spence. So I rest my case there.

You must be joking. He is the list entitled fighter in the history of the sport. He was given a title shot at 20 he didn’t deserve against an unranked welterweight for a 154 pound title. You’ve never seen that before. He got opportunities to fight names like Floyd and Cotto and Mosley at a young age whereas Crawford was blackballed by pbc which orfebres him from fighting any welterweight that mattered. Canelo wasn’t made to face a mandatory for years and the one time he was, he thew a fit and dropped his title. One of 3 times he dropped a title. They then created a fake franchise title to appease him specifically. He also got popped for cheating and the wbc changed their rules as a result. Those are only some examples but there are many more. Most entitled boxer ever.

[Jab jab boom]

You're nit-picking what you can but have no relevant point. It's not debatable but you think it is.

Canelo went and fought the best guy in his division that was destroying everyone 2 times before he cleaned out 168. Then fought him again. It took Crawford his whole career to fight Spence. A couple car crashes and eye surgeries later. And you're blaming it on " entitlement ". What a clown show

Let it go. Crawford's opponents compared to Canelo are ****ty. Youre embarrassing yourself here. I heard a lot on these boards but comparing Crawford and Canelos resume by far the Dumbest **** ever.

I would continue to expose your idiocy as I did on the previous post but your reading comprehension seems very limited and it would likely be a waste of time. I explained my stance and you’re tryin to say I’m making an argument that I’m not. Accept being inferior as canelo is inferior to Crawford as a boxer.

[TheWinners]

I would continue to expose your idiocy as I did on the previous post but your reading comprehension seems very limited and it would likely be a waste of time. I explained my stance and you’re tryin to say I’m making an argument that I’m not. Accept being inferior as canelo is inferior to Crawford as a boxer.

Yeah and you have nothing of substance to prove it. This is not about who we think is a better fighter anyway. This is about a fighter who took more chances that resulted in him building a fanbase. Versus another fighter who took the easy paydays and is wondering why he never got credit for anything.

You think Canelo is the only fighter to think this about Crawford? The man is turning 36. You're blaming his poor resume on PBC(who knew the validity of your entire career depended solely on one rival promoter). Knowing PBC had the keys to his division he happily resigned with Bob Arum. He could've did the same 1 fight deal he did with black prime years ago. He didnt want to. Get that through your tiny brain.

You're buying this nonsense he's selling. He didn't mind banking the paydays and fighting leftovers. He was making a f*** ton of money to do so. He's whining about not getting the credit when he is the reason he doesn't get the credit. He even said he was going to retire if he didn't get the Spence fight. I'd imagine he would retire and claim he was the goat.

He is the one delusional and his win over Spence doesn't all of a sudden make his resume better than other p4p fighters who took more risk than he did.

[boxingitis]

this is laughable. Trout has proven to be nothing but a journeyman in his career and canelo eeked by him. Cotto was 35 with 2 ko losses (beaten by plaster and a non drug tested prime pac) and looked to be 2 weight classes smaller in the ring and again, it was a competitive fight. Lara was a good win but canelo really didn’t even deserve to win that fight. Spence was a top 5 p4p fighter who was undefeated and got utterly destroyed by Crawford. Canelo has never dominated an elite fighter. I would say nice try but that would be giving you too much credit as your reply was ridiculous.

Canelo has never fought a guy coming out life threating crash, eye issues, guy having difficulty making WW, having a long lay off. Name ONE. Nice try. If GGG had all those complications and Canelo KO him, you wouldn't give Canelo credit.

He fougt a GGG with not past life threating car crash, no eye issues, no weight issues, not a more than a year lay off.

Look at Canelos career vs Crawford, they are not at the same level and that's for a reason. Crawford has fought lower level competition. That's the reason Canelo is the face of boxing not Crawford.

[ramses07]

Canelo has never fought a guy coming out life threating crash, eye issues, guy having difficulty making WW, having a long lay off. Name ONE. Nice try.

I think Canelo has tried to weaken a couple of fighters before the actual fight (maybe kov and Chavez jr)

but he’s those aren’t his career defining fights either

[boxingitis]

I think Canelo has tried to weaken a couple of fighters before the actual fight (maybe kov and Chavez jr)

but he’s those aren’t his career defining fights either

Same as Mayweather when he brought Canelo down to 152 from 154, right? After that Canelo never was able to even make 154 again.

I was not impressed by that Kovalev victory either. Only casuals who don't know about the clauses.