Comments Thread For: Team Dubois File Appeal With WBA To Pursue Rematch, Overturn Loss To Usyk Pursue Rematch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vlad_
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2017
    • 13968
    • 3,241
    • 1,478
    • 836,213

    #41
    Originally posted by Phase III
    The sanctioning bodies are so corrupt they make criminal Trump with his massive criminal history look like a saint.

    Expecting the WBA to rule the fight a NC or order a rematch is as likely as Al Haymon finally admitting that he not his puppet Tom Brown is the real PBC promoter.
    You clowns can’t help yourself.

    IMG_4816.jpg

    Comment

    • wrecksracer
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 3709
      • 2,694
      • 2,562
      • 28,783

      #42
      Originally posted by War Room

      You can't see the belly button though, my pointer shows where it most likely is, and the punch lands within a margin of error + or - of 3/16".

      Translation: it's right on the money.
      "most likely." Hey, if the WBA rules for DuBois, more power to him. If even his pinky landed below the belly button, it's not a legal shot. I've heard experts say it was legal. I've heard experts say it is illegal. The WBA is most likely going to leave it to the discretion of the ref.

      Comment

      • Boxing Scene
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 7105
        • 915
        • 1,705
        • 29,819

        #43
        They're not gonna overturn this but if they do Usyk just beats his ass sooner..

        Comment

        • Toffee
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2018
          • 7205
          • 2,490
          • 74
          • 62,824

          #44
          Originally posted by wrecksracer

          "most likely." Hey, if the WBA rules for DuBois, more power to him. If even his pinky landed below the belly button, it's not a legal shot. I've heard experts say it was legal. I've heard experts say it is illegal. The WBA is most likely going to leave it to the discretion of the ref.
          There's no pinky, there's a glove. If the rule is that no part of the glove can go below the belly button then that would be ridiculous.

          Put your first against your stomach so your little finger touches your belly button. That would make it so the glove would be below the belly button.

          You're telling me that's not a legitimate place to punch? It's right in the middle of the stomach.

          Comment

          • wrecksracer
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 3709
            • 2,694
            • 2,562
            • 28,783

            #45
            Originally posted by Toffee

            There's no pinky, there's a glove. If the rule is that no part of the glove can go below the belly button then that would be ridiculous.

            Put your first against your stomach so your little finger touches your belly button. That would make it so the glove would be below the belly button.

            You're telling me that's not a legitimate place to punch? It's right in the middle of the stomach.
            you're going to be sad when they rule that the punch was low.

            Comment

            • War Room
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 9296
              • 2,806
              • 662
              • 19,006

              #46
              Originally posted by wrecksracer

              "most likely." Hey, if the WBA rules for DuBois, more power to him. If even his pinky landed below the belly button, it's not a legal shot. I've heard experts say it was legal. I've heard experts say it is illegal. The WBA is most likely going to leave it to the discretion of the ref.
              Yea, MOST LIKELY. You got a problem with that? There is beyond reasonable doubt it was a legal shot and that's a fact.

              That shot was right on the money and Usyk was knocked out by Dubois, facts. The ref wasn't even looking at the punch, facts lmao.

              You thought you would come up in here with this navel business and win every argument, you're just another parakeet that got owned.

              Comment

              • wrecksracer
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 3709
                • 2,694
                • 2,562
                • 28,783

                #47
                Originally posted by War Room

                Yea, MOST LIKELY. You got a problem with that? There is beyond reasonable doubt it was a legal shot and that's a fact.

                That shot was right on the money and Usyk was knocked out by Dubois, facts. The ref wasn't even looking at the punch, facts lmao.

                You thought you would come up in here with this navel business and win every argument, you're just another parakeet that got owned.
                lol. I guess we'll see who gets owned when the WBA makes it's ruling

                Comment

                • War Room
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 9296
                  • 2,806
                  • 662
                  • 19,006

                  #48
                  Originally posted by wrecksracer

                  lol. I guess we'll see who gets owned when the WBA makes it's ruling
                  It doesn't matter what the ruling is =---> boxing is innately corrupt. I've made 10's of tousands of dollars off corruption in boxing. At the end of the day, it's you that's been owned dear boy.


                  Comment

                  • Combat Talk Radio
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 21727
                    • 2,781
                    • 6,368
                    • 83,247

                    #49
                    Originally posted by hugh grant
                    I think ddd deserves a rematch because there was some controversy regards fight. But doubt you can overturn result, it was a decision by the ref, and ref has final word
                    Soto vs. Lorenzo. Controversy starts at 18:35 below.

                    WBC overrode the ref's decision (Joe Cortez) and refused to give the belt to Lorenzo.





                    Soto would destroy Lorenzo in the rematch.

                    So there IS precedent for overruling the ref when they very obviously get it wrong.

                    Comment

                    • wrecksracer
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 3709
                      • 2,694
                      • 2,562
                      • 28,783

                      #50
                      Originally posted by War Room

                      It doesn't matter what the ruling is =---> boxing is innately corrupt. I've made 10's of tousands of dollars off corruption in boxing. At the end of the day, it's you that's been owned dear boy.


                      nice try. It's not like you have any knowledge of cup placement with that vag!na of yours.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP