Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez: Jermell Is A Better Fighter Than His Brother; He Have A Better Resume

[tomhawq]

He said he doesn’t know who he’s fighting next, and that he and his team will sit down with Haymon after Jermell to find out who’s next.

Well, if Canelo is saying Jermall is the lesser fighter, what's the point of fighting him next?

[richardt]

As soon as the bell rings, Tim Tszyu will be the WBO champ. Get out of here with that promotional krapp. The actual fight won't be undisputed vs undisputed. They are trying to sell the fight as such to attract casuals, who don't follow boxing closely.

You said when he steps in the ring, he gets stripped which is not true. And my recent assertion was he will enter the ring as the undisputed 154 pound kingpin which he will. After that, if he beats Canelo, he gets a high ranking in the PFP. If he loses, he can go to middleweight or defend his 3 titles at 154. He will get paid huge for the Canelo fight and still remain a champion and still considered the kingpin, regardless of not being undisputed by one trinket. The world is his oyster. You can hate him all you want. Won't change his accomplishments.

[wrecksracer]

You said when he steps in the ring, he gets stripped which is not true. And my recent assertion was he will enter the ring as the undisputed 154 pound kingpin which he will. After that, if he beats Canelo, he gets a high ranking in the PFP. If he loses, he can go to middleweight or defend his 3 titles at 154. He will get paid huge for the Canelo fight and still remain a champion and still considered the kingpin, regardless of not being undisputed by one trinket. The world is his oyster. You can hate him all you want. Won't change his accomplishments.

Will this fight be Undisputed vs Undisputed? Yes or no? Your assertion was that it was. My assertion was it wasn't. Whether Charlo loses the belt when he steps in the ring or when the bell rings is completely beside the point. Get out of here with your noise.

[richardt]

Will this fight be Undisputed vs Undisputed? Yes or no? Your assertion was that it was. My assertion was it wasn't. Whether Charlo loses the belt when he steps in the ring or when the bell rings is completely beside the point. Get out of here with your noise.

My recent assertion was that if Charlo could win, he would still at the very least have 7 belts and that one belt is nothing more than a trinket and doesn't change the fact that he is still the top 154 pound fighter. YOU said once Charlo steps in the ring he will no longer be undisputed which is not true and the WBO clearly indicated in the article that he will still be undisputed when he steps in the ring. And he will STILL be the kingpin at 154, regardless of a single trinket.

[wrecksracer]

My recent assertion was that if Charlo could win, he would still at the very least have 7 belts and that one belt is nothing more than a trinket and doesn't change the fact that he is still the top 154 pound fighter. YOU said once Charlo steps in the ring he will no longer be undisputed which is not true and the WBO clearly indicated in the article that he will still be undisputed when he steps in the ring. And he will STILL be the kingpin at 154, regardless of a single trinket.

Until it was pointed out to you that this fight isn't undisputed vs undisputed, your position was that it was undisputed vs undisputed. My position has always been that it isn't. You can't even defend your position. Now it's a technicality over whether he loses the belt when he steps in the ring vs at the bell? Get out of here. You changed your position. Thank you for agreeing with me.

[richardt]

Until it was pointed out to you that this fight isn't undisputed vs undisputed, your position was that it was undisputed vs undisputed. My position has always been that it isn't. You can't even defend your position. Now it's a technicality over whether he loses the belt when he steps in the ring vs at the bell? Get out of here. You changed your position. Thank you for agreeing with me.

Charlo will still be king of 154 and rated as the best at 154. I already said days ago that he would lose his WBO belt but you are too slow in the head to catch up. And you CANNOT defend the fact that you said when Charlo stepped in the ring he would be stripped which is WRONG according to the WBO. Keep skating around that. Keep hating on Charlo, he is a multi-millionaire and you are a bottom feeder who can't live with that. I'm done going in circles with you and won't see more of your crap now that you're on ignore. Now go have a hissy fit over that too.

[wrecksracer]

Charlo will still be king of 154 and rated as the best at 154. I already said days ago that he would lose his WBO belt but you are too slow in the head to catch up. And you CANNOT defend the fact that you said when Charlo stepped in the ring he would be stripped which is WRONG according to the WBO. Keep skating around that. Keep hating on Charlo, he is a multi-millionaire and you are a bottom feeder who can't live with that. I'm done going in circles with you and won't see more of your crap now that you're on ignore. Now go have a hissy fit over that too.

"King of" doesn't mean undisputed. He lost that by refusing to fight his mandatory. Your position was that Canelo vs Charlo is undisputed vs undisputed. Is that true? Yes or no? I can go back and look at your post to see the answer. How does it feel to be wrong?