Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte: I Will Once Again Prove I Am Completely Innocent

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Bob View Post
    I miss the pre Klitschko era mid 80s upto the Lennox Vitali fight.

    Testing was basically a sniff test back then, most were jacked & could go hard for 12 rounds. If anyone popped they paid a fine & it was forgotten about with none or early internet pre social media.

    I say juice up (imagine the war's) or lifetime bans, it's the only way it'll stop.
    You cant make a silk purse out of sows ear, good fights have nothing to do with peds, bozos use peds because they think its a silver bullet which it isnt.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Bob View Post
      I have no more time for B-sample. 3 time's pop pop pop, bore off.

      Question, i remember last time B-sample popped he had a substance in his system that could only be injected yet got off for contamination, is that true?

      Time for a ufc model for doping at least, you pop & there's set bans already in place.
      No-one talks about B Samples. Just people on forums because they don't know what they're talking about.

      The B Sample will show the exact same thing in 99.999% of tests. That won't be their defence. No-one ever relies on that defence. Because 99.999% of the time they'd lose.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by 4truth View Post



        not that you're wrong about Fury but one has nothing to do with the other.
        Yes but this fight Whyte asked for VADA to be involved. And Whyte was cleared of his last postive test. I was showing the contrast.

        Maybe Whyte did cheat but let's see what happens

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Toffee View Post

          No-one talks about B Samples. Just people on forums because they don't know what they're talking about.

          The B Sample will show the exact same thing in 99.999% of tests. That won't be their defence. No-one ever relies on that defence. Because 99.999% of the time they'd lose.
          True, but it also shows that the people know why they tested positive and cannot defend it. The B sample would be of significance if someone believes there has been some sort of contamination with the first sample and they are actually clear. The fact that they do not take about the B sample shows they know it is going to be the same result so they better fight for excuses or technicalities to get out of the situation rather than challenge the accusation that they are not clean.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View Post

            Yes but this fight Whyte asked for VADA to be involved. And Whyte was cleared of his last postive test. I was showing the contrast.

            Maybe Whyte did cheat but let's see what happens
            What some people are reporting (like Dan Rafael) is that Dillian failed multiple VADA tests. That would make him Dillian 'the body pharmacy' Whyte.
            Smash Smash likes this.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Zelda View Post

              True, but it also shows that the people know why they tested positive and cannot defend it. The B sample would be of significance if someone believes there has been some sort of contamination with the first sample and they are actually clear. The fact that they do not take about the B sample shows they know it is going to be the same result so they better fight for excuses or technicalities to get out of the situation rather than challenge the accusation that they are not clean.
              To some extent yes.

              If they argue contamination they're far better arguing it at the point of ingestion or testing rather than after the fact.

              Comment


              • #47
                Ladies and Gentlemen, may we present Great Britain's answer to Antonio Tarver.

                Comment


                • #48
                  just checked the vada webpage on peds, it says

                  "The reason for this special report is to try to reach as many members of the boxing Community in order to share the concerns and provide awareness of the dangers of the use of L-Carnitine . Trainers, Boxers, therapists and members of the boxers teams must be aware of this information and take conscience about the matter.

                  Using L-Carnitine is not clean sports, it is not Fair Play and it is dangerous both to your opponents safety and dangerous to yourself as it has side effects that can affect your health, your future health and your life.

                  In this article we discuss a widely used performance enhancing substance, high dose L-carnitine. High does L-carnitine continues to fly under the radar by many in the anti-doping world, however it is currently being abused by fighters around the world giving them an incredible unfair advantage over their opponents."

                  https://vada-testing.org/2023/06/24/...pecial-report/

                  wonder whos on this stuff so

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Whether you prove it
                    or not, you've just waved goodbye to your final big payday.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Yeah, he didn't time his cycle right.

                      Once is slightly plausible, twice is almost unfathomable, three times and you're dirty, dirty, dirty.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP