Originally posted by richardt
View Post
But theoretical isn't as credible or as reliable as proven which Inoue has in the bag, being champ in 4 divisions and likely to be favourite in 5th. It would be more honourable to have Inoue as no1, otherwise it might seem like your showing favouritism and reaching for a guy
Saying Spence is a better win than anything inoue has is a bit vague argument? I mean pacs best wins were bette r than floyds, but I'm sure floyd was rated no1? I'm sure pacs wins over barrera and jm m was better than anything floyd had to offer at the time. Barrera was no1 or 2 pfp. So dining on idea a spence win is better than any inou e win, is a non starter. A compromised spence win isn't worth that much. Spence isn't the same.
We all wanted to believe it was 50/50 fight as we'd waited so long. Didn't want to admit there was something wrong with spence
Comment