Calm down, why isn't it up for debate? Theoretically bud could be no1, if people think bud was so dominant against pence that they genuinely think if bud moved up another one for two divisions he'd be betting favourite. But I'm not sure people think buds that good or even daring.
But theoretical isn't as credible or as reliable as proven which Inoue has in the bag, being champ in 4 divisions and likely to be favourite in 5th. It would be more honourable to have Inoue as no1, otherwise it might seem like your showing favouritism and reaching for a guy
Saying Spence is a better win than anything inoue has is a bit vague argument? I mean pacs best wins were bette r than floyds, but I'm sure floyd was rated no1? I'm sure pacs wins over barrera and jm m was better than anything floyd had to offer at the time. Barrera was no1 or 2 pfp. So dining on idea a spence win is better than any inou e win, is a non starter. A compromised spence win isn't worth that much. Spence isn't the same.
We all wanted to believe it was 50/50 fight as we'd waited so long. Didn't want to admit there was something wrong with spence
But theoretical isn't as credible or as reliable as proven which Inoue has in the bag, being champ in 4 divisions and likely to be favourite in 5th. It would be more honourable to have Inoue as no1, otherwise it might seem like your showing favouritism and reaching for a guy
Saying Spence is a better win than anything inoue has is a bit vague argument? I mean pacs best wins were bette r than floyds, but I'm sure floyd was rated no1? I'm sure pacs wins over barrera and jm m was better than anything floyd had to offer at the time. Barrera was no1 or 2 pfp. So dining on idea a spence win is better than any inou e win, is a non starter. A compromised spence win isn't worth that much. Spence isn't the same.
We all wanted to believe it was 50/50 fight as we'd waited so long. Didn't want to admit there was something wrong with spence
Comment