Wouldn't the opposite apply to this if it was logical? "Lomachenko had an amateur record of 396 and 1. If he is that good, why doesn't his pro record reflect it?". I want to point out that I think Loma is one of the most skilled fighters I have seen and one of my favorites to watch. I am not throwing shade, just using him since his amateur record is amazing.
Inoue is P4P #1 at the moment
Collapse
-
-
Crazy, Inoue's breakout win over long standing 115lb champion which was a 2rd destruction is better than any Crawford win to date, and I am a big Crawford fan saying that.You guys are dumb as hell. Crawford is more proven, has beaten better competition and has been a consistent pound for pound guy for many years. Inoue just recently got into that list and skil for skill if they were to be the same weight, crawford beats inoue. Inoue has many bad habits like leaping forward with his jabs, no active guard, basic probing and is not as technically sound with his counters. He has been getting away with it due to his opponents being slower and fighting scared.Last edited by Spray_resistant; 08-14-2023, 03:59 PM.Comment
-
You don't need to justify whose fan you are with. You just told on yourself. Quit with the lies.Comment
-
these pfp debates are ****** and deceiving. You could pretty much make a case for a few people being #1. You can make a very strong argument for Bud the same way you can for Inoue, the same way you can for Haney or Bivol. It's all subjective and that's why I don't even participate in debates on a pfp list. They've always been that way since Sweet Pea, Toney, and Chavez were the top 3 fighters in the world before Roy shut out Toney. An argument can be made for almost anyone. So whomever has Inoue #1, no problems from me. If you have Crawford #1, that's fine too.Comment
-
Comment